+1, Do you get ALL your scientific evidence by polling "randomly selected adults"?
Come to think of it, I'm not sure that ERNO isn't one of the aforementioned 'bots
Printable View
I would find it easier to believe in GW if the organization promoting it wasn't more corrupt than a Chicago democrat..
Yes, I do have a problem with manipultion of documents to further an agenda of higher taxes.
Erno, the answer to influence on Earth, is certainly NOT more human influence on Earth. That is the problem people have with constantly being told that they have to "do something" about global warming. I can't think of anything more wrong, than to try and freeze frame things the way that we like them. That goes for the environment and the economy both.
Stuart, how about the influence of the effluent coming out of Rush Limbaugh's mouth. Rush has to be on the board at Exxon Mobil. Or, how much under the table money is he getting from Exxon? So he can spew his lies and half-truths about Global Warming, from a man I consider to be more dangerous to the world's population than Osama Bin Liden!
I honestly do not listen to Rush, and don't know what he says. We've been over that topic on here before though. I don't understand the link to oil companies though. What about logging companies? Why is oil the only industry that should have an opinion about "Global Warming?" Shouldn't most manufacturers and even large corporations be in on the scandal as well?