Drugs Inc, Colorado.

I do have to say...some people on here are not as consistent across the proverbial board when it comes to rights infringements. It's a fine line to walk to be sure, but if you are 100% against any infringement on gun ownership then you really should be consistent and be 100% against any other rights infringement. Otherwise it can come across as hypocritical. Just my two cents.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colorado_Outback

Look dude, sorry I hurt your feelings. Like I said I'm working and don't have time to dig through your 600+ posts..

How about you go back to what ever you were doing before you decided to turn this thread about a TV program into a profiling/racial discussion.

And ill go back to what ever more important shit I was doing before I got distracted by your cry baby attitude.

It will be ok, life will go on, I promise ;)

---

I wouldn't give yourself that much credit genius. You played along with every post I submitted. Nobody forced you to hit the reply button. If your gonna be a troll and make accusations, have something to back it up with. It appears your job is very demanding [ROFL1] so I'll let you get back to it. If your reading comprehension was where it should be you'd know that I didn't start the discussion on profiling in this thread.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PugnacAutMortem

I do have to say...some people on here are not as consistent across the proverbial board when it comes to rights infringements. It's a fine line to walk to be sure, but if you are 100% against any infringement on gun ownership then you really should be consistent and be 100% against any other rights infringement. Otherwise it can come across as hypocritical. Just my two cents.

---

Bingo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PugnacAutMortem

I do have to say...some people on here are not as consistent across the proverbial board when it comes to rights infringements. It's a fine line to walk to be sure, but if you are 100% against any infringement on gun ownership then you really should be consistent and be 100% against any other rights infringement. Otherwise it can come across as hypocritical. Just my two cents.

---

I agree with what you are saying, I'm not sure I agree with the application.
I 100% support your right to an AR. But when you behave, let's say almost illegally with it, I'm not offended if you are "profiled." The example of that guy trying to be provocative in Utah who open carried his AR into the fast food joint with it on his sling is a great example. Technically legal (as is being a minority in a luxury car who is driving unusually at night in certain neighborhoods), but definitely worth watching closely. $0.02 Why? Because you now fit a profile (FAR MORE than the "average" citizen) of someone who may commit a crime.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jim

Happened to us many a time, just for riding motorcycles.

---

Did you call the ACLU?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PugnacAutMortem

I do have to say...some people on here are not as consistent across the proverbial board when it comes to rights infringements. It's a fine line to walk to be sure, but if you are 100% against any infringement on gun ownership then you really should be consistent and be 100% against any other rights infringement. Otherwise it can come across as hypocritical. Just my two cents.

---

Because of looks I`'ve been profiled more times than you can count. Yes I have an issue with it, doesn't mean it will change. Homeland security`s including returning troops is an example. The aclu doesn't go to bat for them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RMAC757

Did you call the ACLU?

---

You are young. There wasn't an aclu then or now, would handle cases like that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeffrey Lebowski

Technically legal (as is being a minority in a luxury car who is driving unusually at night in certain neighborhoods), but definitely worth watching closely. $0.02 Why? Because you now fit a profile (FAR MORE than the "average" citizen) of someone who may commit a crime.

---

Dude! Seriously???

This is retarded. Being black in a Mercedes is not a crime. Why dont you visit Atlanta sometime, you will meet (or see if your scared) black people with a lot more money than you or I have.

Profiling is BS whether its because of race, religion or because you have an NRA sticker on your truck.

One more for Mick!

Quote:

---

http://www.ar-15.co/images/tf_ideal/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Mick-Boy http://www.ar-15.co/images/tf_ideal/...post-right.png
You are flat out of your mind. Haze yourself.

---

I'm gonna back out of this thread as it is obviously going no where. My points had nothing to do with black, pink, purple whatever. My issue had to with rights we should all retain. If an officer can pull you over for not committing a crime and its accepted by the general population....we're headed down a slippery slope. And don't think that most us as gun owners wouldn't someday be targeted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Delfuego

Dude! Seriously???

This is retarded. Being black in a Mercedes is not a crime. Why dont you visit Atlanta sometime, you will meet (or see if your scared) black people with a lot more money than you or I have.

Profiling is BS whether its because of race, religion or because you have an NRA sticker on your truck.

---

Once again - is it the race, religion, or sticker.....or is it the activity?
So yes, seriously.

*I* have a Mercedes. There are an awful lot of things I wouldn't do with it, and an awful lot of places & neighborhoods I won't take it. (Including Atlanta, where I have been several times. Thanks!). Especially at night. I would very much expect to be watched if I did.