NFA Lawsuits: Hollis v. Holder; Watson v. Holder New Machine Guns/Ending the NFA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SamuraiCO

The first paragraph is so wrong the stupid hurts.

If I was in Congress every time some "sensible gun law" would come up for vote I would immediately tack on nationwide CCW reciprocity, removal of the 1996 date for full auto firearms, and override of firearm bans/magazine size limits. If their background checks and "closing the gun show loophole" is really worth anything then they should have no problem relaxing the other stupid laws that have not shown to be effective and just penalizes law abiding citizens.

---

You assume they care about facts, logic, reason, outcomes, or reality. They only want control.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/168....html&page=161


On January 15, 2016, undersigned was provided a copy of a Form 1, approvedon September 5, 1986, for a machinegun to an individual and not a governmental entity.This new fact betrays the Defendants’ claims of never approving an application for anon-governmental entity for a post-May 19, 1986 machinegun, and further,demonstrates that the BATFE has in fact allowed the registrations of post-May 19, 1986machineguns to other than governmental entities.

Well...The ATF has really positioned themselves into a corner.

Update New Form 1 found from 2005!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/296125465/...pproved-Form-1

http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/oralarg...lmettoetal.mp3

Audio of the court case.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SG1

http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/oralarg...lmettoetal.mp3

Audio of the court case.

---

Is there a written transcript?