Printable View
Guess what bro? I just one-sided restrictioned your face!
Thank you for clearing that up. I definitely was under the impression that it was two ways from reading about them on here. Guess I'll just trust everything I read on here less *from now on.
*Or four years, whichever comes first.
Got a notification from the NRA-ILA that this legislation (HB 1436) is being rushed through the House Judiciary Committee today.
Just sent email to Dafna Whatshername, for all the good it will do...
supposedly it sunsets in 1 year. Then has to be reviewed.
So I saw that CA had one like this, what is the worst that has happened. These things give me the willies since it seems that we can't take care of people who are obviously trouble, like the Parkland shooter. A new tool that won't be used?
This is where we could get real compromise. 30 round mags back, CCW for SBRs- something. Hell, 30 rounders for CCW holders would be a sweet add, since it would get them 'back on the shelves' and let people be responsible for their own compliance.
And then go back for more when it comes time to review..... ;)
I don't see where we're getting anything out of this.
Saw Tony “Two Faced” Spurlock on 9 News this morning holding a press conference telling Colorado legislators that if they don’t vote for this they don’t care enough, and that they don’t want to take anyone’s guns!
The worst part of this is they are attaching a dead Deputy’s name to this. Parrish would still be dead if this law had passed, all that would have changed is the responding officers would have had a piece of paper with them. Patrol officers should NOT be the ones entering an armed, mentally disturbed, barricaded suspects domicile to enforce ANY type of court ordered action, those types of calls should be reserved for SWAT.
Not good.
So, because of my beliefs, somebody could say that I am a public risk and my firearms (and my job at the range) are gone...