He's alive...https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...1a874a366b.jpg
Printable View
I'd go read his statement myself, if the government/media, hasn't warned me against it.
Thanks, hollohas, and I will probably go read it anyway. Fuck those that don't want me to read it.
-John
I believe that 4Chan is responsible for tricking the world (media) into thinking that the "OK" sign was a white supremacist thing.
I just see more holes ;)
-John
Damn I looked! A punch for me!
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=235319
Quote:
2019-03-15 10:52 by Karl Denninger
in Editorial , 310 references
Terrorism and Censorship
The insanity is on full display this morning.
Last night I read the shooter's "manifesto" on Scribd, all ~80 pages of it. This morning it has been scrubbed.
Book-burning is alive and well among so-called "progressives."
I can make a fairly-clean argument for yanking the so-called "live stream" -- but what is everyone afraid of when it comes to written words? Is someone (or lots of someones) afraid that perhaps there's some truth embedded in what will be viewed as an expression of insanity?
That's something to think about because there was truth embedded in that document. Among the truths was that Anglo-Saxon culture and people are being slowly exterminated by their own hand; they simply are not reproducing at a rate sufficient to replace themselves as they get older and die. That's fact, not hyperbole.
In addition there was the fact that the "migrants" that are so "welcomed" by various factions in the United States and elsewhere have many more children than required to replace themselves. Math is an ugly bitch according to many I suppose; it bears no animus, it has no political bent and it cannot be dismissed as "racist." It just is.
Then there's the fact that the entire western world has established a welfare state and in combination with open borders the producers are decreasing every single year while those who consume far more in tax resources than they produce are increasing. This is,once again, mathematical fact. In addition the end game of such a system is also mathematical fact and easily visible. I've pointed it out repeatedly in these pages as well; does that make me a racist?
And finally there is the fact (not mentioned, however) that it's our fault that we set the table and opened the door. "We", being Americans, Europeans and similar. If I build a pool and do not fence it, then a child falls in and drowns, I'm the one who gets tagged for an attractive nuisance even if the child was old enough to know he or she couldn't swim and thus the water was dangerous and even if the child was also old enough to know that they were trespassing and thus committing a crime by being there.
Doesn't matter -- if I put out a buffet and then people take all the food I'm the one who set the table.
The insanity of what we're seeing from the left is on full display. Al Gore just said "climate change will destroy civilization" yet Al Gore supports unlimited migration, open borders and people screwing like rabbits. Since more people means more resource consumption you can't have this both ways; if you really believe that "climate change" can kill us all then you can't support any subgroup of people that breed at materially above replacement rate because the outcome of such a policy is mathematically certain.
The shooter's manifesto also contained two other nuggets of truth nobody wants to discuss, and thus it must be buried. First is that in the US as soon as Texas flips to blue there will never again be a Republican President. Ever. That's the Electoral Math -- and it's indisputable. The fact that those who come here illegally, and they number more than 10 million, produce far more children than native people do will inevitable flip said state is inconvenient, but factual. Now couple that with what we have today coming from the Democrats in terms of professed policy and you have what I've written about many times: There is no reason for a producer today to produce.
I can, with a lot of work, earn a mid-six figure income. I've done it before and have the tax checks and Social Security and Medicare earnings and tax records to prove it. When Obamacare passed I said there was no way I'd do it again so long as anything approaching that remained on the books. Why? Because I produced and many more than my one person got what I made without producing anything. It was taken from me under threat of being imprisoned or shot and I got nothing back out of it. I certainly didn't get a stronger, better society -- I instead got people who won't assimilate into America, who demand Sharia Law in the US and who call me a racist *******. They break every ****ing law in the book and in turn get "sanctuary" from law enforcement while those who are citizens get jailed. I'm told I must cover their housing, medical care and food -- or I go to prison. Among the illegal invaders there are millions who refuse to follow the rules in America; it's why "uninsured motorist" coverage is so damned expensive, never mind who's running most of the heroin and fentanyl into this country. If caught the cops let those people go even if they hit someone and cause injury or worse; if I, on the other hand, do not have car insurance, drive and get caught I go to jail. Colorado prosecuted -- twice -- a baker for refusing to make a gay wedding cake (and one celebrating "transition"); he beat both after much effort by proving that the state came after him because he is religious. Walk into any of the Muslim bakeries in Dearborn MI (you can't walk a couple of blocks there without finding one) to demand a gay wedding cake -- you'll be told to pound sand and get the **** out of their establishment. These are people who believe gays should be stoned to death or thrown from high buildings -- their "religious beliefs" -- and yet none of them have been harassed, closed down or prosecuted.
I'm not supposed to "discriminate", in short, under pain of being called all sorts of nasty names or even arrested yet those who come here illegally or for the handouts not only can discriminate they do on a daily basis and not one single bad thing happens to them. Ever. We even elect them to Congress and let them spew tropes that have been used to spread hatred for decades, even centuries without a single word of rebuke.
Then there's the other nasty truth that was demonstrated last night. The shooter's manifesto proclaimed that part of his intent was to foment a civil war over the 2nd Amendment here in the United States. You can bet the left will seize on this shooting and further his agenda. You can also bet that the citizens of this nation are too ****ing stupid to realize the obvious, although if you find and watch the livestream of him mowing down people in that mosque (yeah, I've seen it) what will be instantly obvious is that had just one of the attendees had a pistol and hid around a corner he could have nailed that son-of-a-bitch right in the head and put a stop to that crap. But.... you see..... there is no 2nd Amendment in New Zealand and everyone inside the mosque was unarmed.
Well, the first mosque anyway. In the second it appears he encountered someone who was armed and chased his ass out of there. Go figure.
The left wants to make you equally able to be shot right here, right now, in America and the people of this nation are too damned stupid to tell them all to pound sand and mean it.
If that's not enough Muslims bombed a Philippine Catholic Church in January, murdering 20 people and injuring 100. Where was the wall-to-wall press coverage? Religious terrorism aimed at Christians isn't less heinous than that aimed at Muslims...... or is the truth that one is ignored by the media and politicians in DC (and possibly even quietly cheered around the office watercooler) while the other is condemned?
I could go on but what's the point?
If we start asking too many questions about whether mass-murder is ever excusable we wind up in some pretty nasty places -- and thus we can't have that discussion and must bury both printed word and live video. I put out as Exhibit "A" of our national insanity Newt Gingrich who just yesterday put forward the statement that our military should remove Maduro, in a sovereign land, and in an operation that will inevitably involve mass-murder with a body count higher than what just happened in Christchurch.
Never mind that William Barr, our AG, just said the threat of political and religious violence is real and we must remain vigilant against it. Does he intend to indict -- or at least rebuke -- Newt? Or is his statement of contempt and vigilance only apply to the times when he likes the targets of said political and religious violence?
A buddy sent me some articles shortly after the Vegas shooting, there were several inconsistencies and another 'person of interest' which never appeared in follow-up reports.
I'm not big on conspiracy theories, but maybe there are some things that were not investigated as thoroughly as they should have.