Look who grew some 'Nads!

Official Demands.

1. I need to research Glass-Steagall before I comment.
2. Needs to include Congressional Criminals that forced the CRA on the banks in the first place. Also needs to include Presidents Bush and Obama and their staff that were involved with the frauds called TARP, Quantitative Easing I and II. Barney Frank and Chris Dodd should be indicted as well and they forgot to include anyone involved with the Federal Reserve including Herman Cain.
3. I don't see unions mentioned here, as long as unions can contribute corporations should be allowed to contribute as well.
4. Fair Share Tax Crap - the top 5% already pay the vast majority of income taxes. The bottom 50% of wage earners contribute almost nothing to the Federal Budget.
5. Define professionals, is a professional a liberal arts major whose first question at work is "Do you want fries with that" or is the professional student and proponent of Marx or is the professional a student and proponent of Adam Smith and Milton Friedman.
6. I'm for that. I've long wanted lobbyists out of the system.
7. I'm for that based on conflict of interest.
8. I'll have to research the 14th amendment some more.

There is more stuff there than I have time to read right now. I did a scan and they want the Federal Government to take over the Federal Reserve, that won't change a thing. The Federal Governement is at the heart of all our problems.

Healthcare is not a right.

I'd like to see the War on Drugs ended.

I'd like the see the government completely out of the education system.

I am for the Death Penalty, we just need to eliminate the ridiculous appeals process and swiftly execute the sentence once the sentence is handed down.

I scanned it some more

There is 9/11 truther BS in there. HAHAHA, anyone who thinks 9/11 was perpetrated by the US government is a phvkking moron and I'll tell them right to their phvkking face, if I know and like the person I'll just smile, nodd and walk away.

I find it pretty sad to see someone say that one protest is right and another is wrong, regardless of how they're done.

The very fact that a group of people needs something like a permit, insurance, security or anything else in order to demonstrate, just illustrates a broader problem we have in this country.

And bitching about them delaying your morning commute? I doubt anyone here would bitch if a family of Elk camped out in the middle of the road when you were trying to get somewhere. Same as if some pro-gun, or pro anything else that you agree with slowed you up a little in the morning.

The word gets out that some liberals are giving these people a nod, and the whole lot of them fall into the 'bad' category for some of you.

As it has been said, their message is unclear and convoluted, but they're out there doing something... And they aren't being shot, gassed, rounded up and being thrown in train cars, etc. This is good for all of us in my opinion and something we should remember to be thankful for.

Things like this, regardless of the cause, puts the powers that be back on edge a little and causes them to think about the consequences of the circus they're running.

With that said, if any of those clowns are breaking any serious laws, I hope they get their skulls cracked and locked up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jhood001

And bitching about them delaying your morning commute? I doubt anyone here would bitch if a family of Elk camped out in the middle of the road when you were trying to get somewhere. Same as if some pro-gun, or pro anything else that you agree with slowed you up a little in the morning.

---

What part of infringing on the rights of others don't you understand? Oh that's right, when its your protest everyone else can suck it, typical liberal slant.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by roberth

What part of infringing on the rights of others don't you understand? Oh that's right, when its your protest everyone else can suck it, typical liberal slant.

---

I'm not sure how that statement qualifies as 'liberal slant', nor would I call what is going on 'my protest'.

I'll be downtown sometimes on a game day and I find that traffic is impeded by people going to see the game. I'm not a big baseball or football fan, but the last thing that enters my mind when the light turns green and there is still a steady stream of fans crossing the street is that my rights are being infringed.

Nor do I feel that my rights are being infringed when I go somewhere and I can't get in because it is crowded.

I'm merely saying that being inconvenienced is generally just an inconvenience to most of us unless we can find something within it that we don't agree with. Then we scramble to the 'infringed rights' argument.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by roberth

What part of infringing on the rights of others don't you understand? Oh that's right, when its your protest everyone else can suck it, typical liberal slant.

---

You're just proving the point that Tea Party gets a pass but Occupy Wall St. doesn't.

I'd explain it to a couple of you but I wouldn't be able to understand it for you. So I'll pass on even making an attempt.

You're logic is incredibly and obviously flawed. Reality must be a strange place for a couple of you guys.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

I'd explain it to a couple of you but I wouldn't be able to understand it for you. So I'll pass on even making an attempt.

---

Sense this does not make.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DeusExMachina

Sense this does not make.

---

Actually, it does and it is pretty damn funny.

He can do the explaining for someone, but he can't do the understanding on their behalf for them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DeusExMachina

Sense this does not make.

---

Go figure. You don't get it. Color me surprised.