Originally Posted by
foxtrot
I also think, that in a lot of cases, people will essentially open the door, basically invite them in, LEO's search, etc. etc. Then after the fact the homeowner is pissed off (of course) does some research/talks to people and realizes that they didn't HAVE to get searched. No sympathy for those that learn AFTER the fact. Learn your rights, exercise them, and you will have my support. If the father had stepped out, closed the door and politely stated he doesn't consent to searches, and the beat him down with nightsticks and kicked his door in shouting "this is the police" then you would have my full support. Instances like these are like thinking of a good comeback twelve hours after an argument is already over. You might want to act like it matters, but it doesn't count.
People act like its LEO's responsibility to teach them their rights. "Ma'am, can we come in? We would like to search your house to see if you have any meth making products, but did you know by the bill of rights you can tell us you don't consent to a search and we would actually have to get a warrant? Oh? we cant come in now?"
Of COURSE they work off peoples ignorance. That doesn't make them bad LEO. That just makes the people NAIVE - their own fault. No cookies for the uneducated.