Printable View
That's outside my lane, but generally the conversation around liability is along the lines of "what did our insured do wrong?" If the answer is "nothing, up until someone wanted to apply something after the fact..." then that's a tough argument to deny coverage. That's just my opinion though.
Curioser and curiouser.
I'm starting to wonder if that is what got him in trouble. IF he had a camera and he said something before the incident....Quote:
Originally Posted by Zundfolge
ie: "Hey fucker, do that again and I'll kill you"
Do you think the Uber charged dead guys' fare?
During Uber employment (on shift), is a driver's car considered Uber "property" in any capacity?
The drivers are all independent contractors so no.Quote:
Originally Posted by CavSct1983
If you work for a company that has conditions that CCW is not allowed, and you agree to those conditions, you're likely out of a job if it's known that you violated those conditions. You're not breaking the law, but you are breaking the conditional employment agreement.
Some will argue that you can get another job if you use a gun for self-defense, but you can't get another life. In this case, the Uber driver is still in a fight for his life...and he's likely all alone in that fight.
Sent from my electronic leash using Tapatalk
Curious what the "after deliberation" entails.
Interesting how two different stations prioritize the same autopsy report information...
Channel 9 KUSA-
Quote:
Uber passenger killed on I-25 had blood alcohol level nearly 4 times legal limit
https://www.9news.com/article/news/l...t/73-578719301
Channel 7 KMGH-
Quote:
Autopsy report: Man allegedly killed by Denver Uber driver was shot 6 times
https://www.thedenverchannel.com/new...s-shot-6-times