For the win!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey Guns
Printable View
For the win!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey Guns
Details coming out...
A Sexual-Misconduct Allegation Against the Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh Stirs Tension Among Democrats in Congress
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-...ts-in-congress
Best part...
So Kavanaugh is an attempted rapist. No actual assault happened.Quote:
In the letter, the woman alleged that, during an encounter at a party, Kavanaugh held her down, and that he attempted to force himself on her. She claimed in the letter that Kavanaugh and a classmate of his, both of whom had been drinking, turned up music that was playing in the room to conceal the sound of her protests, and that Kavanaugh covered her mouth with his hand. She was able to free herself. Although the alleged incident took place decades ago and the three individuals involved were minors, the woman said that the memory had been a source of ongoing distress for her, and that she had sought psychological treatment as a result.
[snip]
In a statement, Kavanaugh said, “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time.”
Kavanaugh’s classmate said of the woman’s allegation, “I have no recollection of that.”
The woman declined a request for an interview.
Accuser stayed silent for ~30 years. Accuser won't be named or interviewed.
I can't say this is how it happened here, but we saw with Judge Roy Moore and Trump how it works. They assemble a pool of money (compensation) and start looking for people who will make allegations in bad faith. Typically, so far in the past they are impossible to disprove in the short term. Then they hire a high profile "feminist" attorney with ties to Dems to shield the whole operation and make it look legitimate.
Nothing even goes to court or faces an evidentiary standard. No one is put under oath.
This accusation didn't organically happen. Feinstein is a CA senator. None of this involves her district.
If you have a penis and haven't worn a body cam your whole life, the same can be done to you.
Still no pubic hair and a Coke can. Welcome to the bench Justice Kavanaugh.
I don't believe this at all. Not a bit. Another fabricated lie by democrats.
I hate 'em. But by God they are persistent.
Perfect response! [LOL]Quote:
Originally Posted by cstone
You think Thomas and Kavanaugh just became friends?
It's 11th hour BS. The way it was drafted also implies criminality when it turns out the accuser didn't even accuse Kavanaugh of a crime, just an "attempt."Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey Guns
People on socials are saying Feinstein sat on this from July on and waited. We all know why... Less time = less time to prove innocence and #MeToo demands the presumption of guilt.
Over on Legal Insurrection, they said this very thing was predicted -- the Dems knew Grassley's staff would be organized so they staged a hit on his character for after hearings ended in order to upset Murkowski and Collins.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/0...is-allegation/
https://t.co/TMWf9uzzEV
Kabuki Theater at its sickest.
This 11th hour accuser. Just the accusation with all the TV play makes him "guilty" in the Democrats mind. Any excuse they can make to derail a good man.
Same play they employed against Clarence Thomas. At a minimum, they hope to besmirch him forever like they did to Thomas and on the outside they hope to derail or delay his confirmation.
I don't have a problem with resurfacing an allegation that's decades old but 1) this is fuzzy, 2) Feinstein held onto it all summer as a last-ditch weapon instead of pushing it immediately to the FBI for confirmation or negation, 3) a clinical psychologist from CA who remembers this 30 years later during a marriage counseling session? Really? Juanita Broadrick's accusations (which were conveniently ignored by the mass media until they could say it was "old news") had contemporary corroboration -- she told people immediately after it happened, even if she didn't file charges.
Ole Bill had a fairly open history of using political, legal, and even physical force on women but the press conveniently ignored it all to focus on Bush's "lack of spine". I was less offended by how much Bill let the little head do his thinking than by the outright partisan skullduggery on the part of the mass media. Similarly, I am less concerned about the last minute allegations than the way Feinstein manipulated the process and clearly chose 2 months ago to hold onto this as a political attack. She ought to be vilified by the feminist press for this (but won't be).
They are trying to make this blow up and the accuser has stepped forward...
https://apnews.com/e2c35c0fb46f4464b...-comes-forward
So definitely not a politicized Dim then.Quote:
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”
Ford, 51 and a clinical psychology professor at Palo Alto University in California, says she was able to get away after a friend of Kavanaugh’s who was in the room jumped on top of them and everyone tumbled.
Uh huh.Quote:
Ford’s husband, Russell Ford, also told the newspaper that his wife described during therapy being trapped in a room with two drunken boys and that one of them had pinned her to a bed, molested her and tried to prevent from screaming. He said he recalled his wife using Kavanaugh’s last name and expressing concern that Kavanaugh — then a federal judge — might someday be nominated to the Supreme Court.
I too worry about all the Federal judges who might someday because Supreme Court Justices but only if I disagree with them.
Sounds like Duke Lacrosse team party. Where she was the only female. Where she got every detail wrong and it doesn't matter because she's a victim. This all sounds very familiar.Quote:
The therapist’s notes say four boys were involved, but Ford says that was an error by the therapist. Ford says four boys were at the party, but only two boys were in the room at the time.
And then kept her mouth shut from 198x (we still don't have a date/place) - 2012 because Kavanaugh is so dangerous he should be allowed to get rapey for 30+ years.
Thanks FLAKE.Quote:
Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., a committee member, told The Washington Post and Politico in interviews Sunday that he’s “not comfortable” voting for Kavanaugh until he learns more about the allegation. Flake is one of 11 Republicans on the committee, whose 10 Democrats all oppose Kavanaugh. A potential “no” vote from Flake would complicate Kavanaugh’s prospects.
Feinstein applauded Flake’s call to slow things down.
“I agree with Senator Flake that we should delay this week’s vote,” she said. “There’s a lot of information we don’t know and the FBI should have the time it needs to investigate this new material.”
Anyone know how the FBI investigates a non-crime that happened 30 years ago? Let alone gives Congress a definitive opinion on what happened.
The Legal Advisor for Kavanaugh’s Accuser Is a Big Time Democratic Donor, Thinks People Who Work for Trump Are 'Miscreants'
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timoth...jones-n2519525
This one is good too. The people behind this are anything but objective.
Hey, it's all for women. Do you hate women?