Me with my PMag in afghanistan, today. Haven't heard of any bans yet. http://i1190.photobucket.com/albums/...601-132656.jpg
Printable View
Me with my PMag in afghanistan, today. Haven't heard of any bans yet. http://i1190.photobucket.com/albums/...601-132656.jpg
^ Someone should send they man a decent stock...[Tooth]
Thanks, but I wouldn't waste your time. I think somebody said things like that can't be sent through the mail. I don't know if it's true or not, but I wouldn't waste the money. Plus, when wearing our garbage body armor, getting an adequate cheek weld and getting the stock to sit snugly in the shoulder pocket is nearly impossible no matter which stock is used.Quote:
Originally Posted by spyder
Still using those IOTVs eh? I hated that, we'd have so many issues when we switched from the old Interceptor to those... Remember, all your equipment is made by the lowest bidder.[Bang]Quote:
Originally Posted by josh7328
yeah we do. IOTV's and equally crap-tastic plate carriers. My IOTV ripped within the first month in country... and it had only been on one convoy when it ripped. garbage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin13
You have to pimp the IOTV out. I have a few techniques that one could use to make it really comfortable.
And now they are unbanned.
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2...2887570&rank=1
Like removing the plates and stuffing with MRE box cardboard?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordanls19
Or you could stuff them with the PolyPro's they made you pack on the packing list......that you never used!!!!!
Now this is an administrative pee pee whacking. Someone is going to remedial writing for bureaucrats training:
Army officials acknowledged June 6 that TACOM’s message was poorly written and not intended as a directive on the use of PMAGs. Matthew Bourke, an Army spokesman at the Pentagon responding to questions from Mililtary.com, said the message should have included guidance that the final decision rests with commanders in the field.
“At best, the message is incomplete; at worst the message allows soldiers to jump to the wrong conclusions,” Bourke said. “Maintenance Information Messages [from TACOM] are permissive. They are not an order. They are not a directive. All content and direction in those messages are optional for the recipient.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh7328
stay safe out there man!!!