Hickenlooper's video message on Gun Control

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Irving

By you saying that it doesn't bother you, because you already do it, leads members to believe that it would also make you complacent during these bills and not actively fight against them. That is the gap between what you've said, and what you meant. It is a natural assumption that if something changes that does not affect you, you would not go out of your way to fight against it.

---

Fair enough, but I have been and will continue to be fighting against this and every piece of firearms legislation that has come out. I suppose I should have prefaced my original question with that fact. I thought being the owner of and member on a forum for the most vilified firearm out there, that that statement would have gone without saying. I recognize that any win the gun-grabbers chalk up against us, small or big, will only lead to worse and worse things for all of us down the road. So no matter if a law changes what I do already or not I have and will oppose it.

Wow did that piss me off!!!!
Don't compromise on a damn thing, that's how this shit gets out of control!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by n8tive97

Don't compromise on a damn thing, that's how this shit gets out of control!

---

Being COMPLETELY unwilling to compromise is the mark of a zealot or an extremist . . . which is how the anti-gun Liberals are trying to portray us: bigoted zealots who hate the government.

HOWEVER . . . "compromise" needs to apply to both parties, and the Liberal anti-gunners only want to take, take, take and LIE about what they are doing. Personally, if they want to require a background check for sales, I'm opposed to it, but I can understand why they feel a need for it. There is NO LEGITIMATE JUSTIFICATION for arbitrarily mandating background checks on vaguely defined non-sale "transfers" such as trades or storing a gun at a relative or friend's house . . . that is complete bullshit, and as far as I know, no other state has such an overreaching and Draconian law. I am going out of state for a couple of weeks and ask my friend if I can store a couple of guns, in a lockbox, at his home . . . by law he needs to undergo a background check after 72 hours, and I need to undergo one when I come back to pick up my own property? And if we neglect to do this we'te both criminals who automatically lose our rights to own guns? THAT is exactly what Bloomberg and Biden want from this bill . . . the non-sale "transfer" provision hidden in the small print . . . hardly anyone I know is even aware that provision exists . . . they snuck it in, it is unprecedented, deceitful, arbitrary, and insidious.