Printable View
Well you know what they say, it's harder to keep the lie straight...Quote:
Originally Posted by Gman
Agreed... They're there to play a game and entertain us, not protest. They should be fined and/or suspended for that BS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey Guns
Like Tim Tebow was for going down on one knee & Praying? That type of fine, OR IS there different 1st amendment freedom of expressions in the NFL.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin13
Don't forget an aide resigned after her comments about O's kids. That first amendment like the 2nd sure is a pick and choose, when it comes to D's & Progressives.
Wait a minute, when did the Cardinals leave St Louis and the Rams move there?
Professional athletes are as likely to influence my opinions as professional musicians or professional Thesbians.
Hände hoch, nicht schießen!
Worked pretty well during WWII [Coffee]
Sir Charles calls it like he sees it:
http://youtu.be/r7ayUYvTrVg
Also, if you google Charles Barkley and Micheal Brown the only hits that show up are from:
Foxnews
CNSNews
TheBlaze
Christanpost
CSMonitor
nothing from: CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC etc etc
Doesn't fit the narrative...
From what I've seen, Barkley is actually fairly conservative. He believes in rewarding hard work, he doesn't like the nanny state, etc. 30 years ago, we'd have caled him a moderate but today that vein of thinking is deemed hard-line conservative ... [Bang]
For a perspective of how far left we've traveled, JFK probably would have been considered a Republican in today's political environment. He believed in such absurd ideas as reducing taxes to stimulate the economy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter
There used to be conservatives in the Democrat party. They've been shoved out by the leftist agenda.
There used to be conservatives in the Republican party. They've been shoved out by the elitist ruling class (or at least said rulers are trying their damndest to finish the job :P)Quote:
Originally Posted by Gman
From the article:
Americans have not only the right to protect themselves from violent criminals, they have the right to protect others.
Some of us might even believe that we have a moral obligation to protect those who cannot protect themselves.
http://bearingarms.com/cooke-defense...paign=baupdate
St. Louis police, meanwhile, insisted that they are bound “to investigate” any outfit that seeks to protect the public.
I loved this statement. We should send a list of all the outfits that seek to protect the public and send that to the St Louis police department to see how long it takes them to investigate. They can start with the St Louis police department. No one should ever try to interfere with a government agency and their monopoly of power [Sarcasm2] After all, the fire department would be offended if random citizens began putting out fires. If random citizens began offering first aid, wouldn't the EMTs and paramedics become outraged? What if average citizens failed to commit any crimes? Would the police department disband? Would the District Attorney's Office cease to exist?
If I felt like I couldn't leave my home or business due to realistic fear of destruction, what law would I be breaking to invite a few well intentioned friends to bring some sleeping bags, some s'mores and a few firearms to come camp out with me at my home or residence. My property...shouldn't I be free to invite anyone I choose to visit with me?
I believe Oath Keepers are still in Ferguson. I doubt they will leave any faster than they did when they were visiting the Bundy Ranch.
Be safe.
Here's an article with the various YouTube vids showing the Oathkeepers' situation in Ferguson. Please don't dis the website it's hosted on, I didn't want to link all the YouTubes in this thread, this one article is a simpler way to do it (imnsho). Not to mention most of you here have respect for the author of the article!
http://beforeitsnews.com/police-stat...video-424.html