Printable View
What ever his political leanings, Berkeley is a major indicator. The infighting on the left to see who's more PC is mind boggling. I'm waiting for the first (reported) case of a sjw having a coronary trying to show someone they are less racist, than their circle jerk of liberalsQuote:
Originally Posted by Bailey Guns
4 more years of this...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/24/berkeley-protesters-form-human-chain-stop-white-st/Quote:
Students at the University of California, Berkeley held a day of protest on Friday to demand the creation of additional “safe spaces” for transgender and nonwhite students, during which a human chain was formed on a main campus artery to prevent white students from getting to class.
So is Michael Savage and Greg Gutfeld.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey Guns
If you look at some of the most powerful voices on "the right", the vast majority of them are former libs. Andrew Breitbart, Bill Whittle, David Horowitz, Thomas Sowell, Evan Sayet, Andrew Klavan (another Berkeley student) and dozens more.
My hope is that Adams has "got woke" ... not holding my breath but its my hope.
I've read some more of his stuff. He's a self-described "social liberal". He also says he's pro-gun. He obviously has no clue of the monumental contradiction he states in describing why he's pro-gun. He's probably not a flaming, communist-type liberal, but he's too left-leaning for me to really trust anything he says. Just my opinion.
Quote:
I am pro-gun.
Because … I might someday have a good reason to shoot someone who is bigger than me or armed. If your reason for supporting gun ownership involves loyalty to a document written hundreds of years ago by slave-owners with muskets, you probably have some explaining to do. Don’t include me in that camp. I support gun rights because I think there is a good chance I might someday need to shoot a human. Period. If the Constitution prohibited personal gun ownership, I would have to consider violating that document, for my own sense of safety.
His reasoning is at least more likely than fighting the government.
Or the editorsQuote:
Originally Posted by Irving
What he ^^^ saidQuote:
Originally Posted by Zundfolge
More to the point, if somebody that is a self-proclaimed "social liberal" (whatever he thinks that means) can see Hillary for what she really is and thinks Trump (however ________ you think he is) is an obvious better choice.... then there's hope.
As long as enough dead people are kept from voting, or people from voting in multiple states, etc...
I'm registered to vote in Colorado, have my mail-in ballot, but all I need to register and vote here in TX (where I am at the moment) is a utility bill showing I own a home in TX (and I do)... I'm too honest to do it, but there is nothing in the way with the current legal parameters that prevents me from voting in both CO and TX (no DL required to vote, which I think is by DEM design)
Except getting caught...Quote:
Originally Posted by 68Charger
Well also having scruples, morals and ethics.Quote:
Originally Posted by craysQuote:
Originally Posted by 68Charger
Except getting caught...