Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by DOC
You have Denver and Boulder.
The only hope we have is to get a REP that appeals to the suburban women. That is where the swing vote is for governor.
And most suburban women dont really have "gun rights" high on their list.
My personal opinion is the REPS have the best chance putting a woman up at the moment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by crays
Because right now I cannot buy standard cap magazine. So, if I had to pay somewhat more than not getting it at all, I would rather that.
Its not that I want to pay more. Its a game of "would I rather".
I would rather pay a whole lot less in taxes in general. But at least if I have to pay them, maybe I can get a little satisfaction...
Most of them I talk to (have some work for me) dont blame the collectivism.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip
They cannot separate the "social injustice" and "income inequality" from taxes.
They think they should pay less (no matter what they make) and other should pay more.
The simple version of most peoples vision of taxes is:
Anyone who makes less than me is a lazy bum who doesnt pay their fair share; anyone who makes more than me is a greedy bastard that doesnt pay their fair share"
And how much does that increase next year, and the next, and the next...Quote:
Originally Posted by DDT951
And what is the next "Oh, don't worry, they'll gladly pay to have it" item for them to tax/fee/regulate your rights with?
Quote:
Originally Posted by crays
Probably the same as the "bridge fee" on motor vehicle registration.
I dont even really property rights. If I dont pay taxes on the property...just see how fast it is seized.
I am so screwed by taxes, a little more a little less make no difference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by crays
Get creative.
What can you offer DEMS that they would trade to get rid of the mag ban?
They wont sign on out of the goodness of their hearts. So its make some sort of deal.
Let keep in mind....
The bumpstock bill...
Michael Merrifield..
DEM... El Paso county
When El Paso county is pushing gun parts bans and has no fear of repercussions (voters) we are in trouble.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DDT951
Curious, are you an actual gun owner? If you are one, why did you not buy greater than 15 round mags before the law took effect?
From your post sounds more like one of those common sense hunters and sportsman i've encountered before. Lets make nice so we can beg for our Constitutional RIGHTS.
Why do "we have to compromise" ??
Not sure what age bracket you're in, however i've seen compromise since 86. Oddest thing........... NEVER has the other side compromised on any gun law, Ever. Only thing i've seen.... Is MORE Laws, More restrictions, More road blocks for gun owners.
So yeah lets compromise and have more rights taken away.
I will give up abortion for gun rights that are not infringed in anyway. Will need a house with more bedrooms but it will be a small price to pay. Not that I supported those decisions in anyway to begin with.
How about we actually use that "Road & Bridge fee" to actually fix roads and bridges. And that hasn't gone up since it's inception. $25 @$$ r@pe since it started. "It's not a tax, it's a FEE"
Have you read the itemization of your registration fee? Or don't you own a vehicle?
Your logic is flawed, in the least, and selfish, at the worst.
Good luck.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk