I'm sure Hick would have liked the 19,500 green party voters as well.
Printable View
I'm sure Hick would have liked the 19,500 green party voters as well.
Sounds like Denver and Boulder do still have about 10-20 percent of their votes yet to be counted but there are many other counties including ElPaso still counting too.
I am still hopeful Rs take the house, senate and the Gov chair.
There are a number of counties that are heavily going to Bob that haven't yet fully reported. Pueblo is 97.7%, so no huge moves there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin13
Likely all rejected by the machine
if you do the math that means 3000 votes an hour.. thats 50 votes a min checked..
Nah..Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin
DUPEQuote:
Originally Posted by theGinsue
Hick is on 9news saying no resolution tonight... Sounds like he is getting ready for a recount. I think if it is within .5% a recount is triggered.
So close, yet so far...
Yeah, I know.Quote:
Nah..
A guy can wish, though.
The Gang of Four have had much more of an impact on the leftward slide of Colorado politics than all of the libertarian voters in the intermountain west combined, but since Tim Gill doesn't post here, Bailey can't lash out at him.
It's been that way a few years now..This election cycle confirmed it for those in denial. The comments for most of the Coloradans opinion page have been an easy 80 - 85% progressive diatribe for some time.Quote:
Originally Posted by RblDiver
Hey, those vegan volunteers can only fill out and stuff so many ballot boxes per hour before they get tired and have to drink a gluten-infused wheat grass smoothie to recharge.Quote:
Hick is on 9news saying no resolution tonight... Sounds like he is getting ready for a recount. I think if it is within .5% a recount is triggered.
Clearly they need more time.
The lead is still about 14.5K for Bob.
I'm didn't lash out at anybody. Just made an observation. And considering the libertarian track record for winning major elections, or any election for that matter, I don't think I'm the one who needs to "get over it".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey Guns
You both aren't counting 19,000 votes for Dunafon. Something tells me those folks wouldn't have voted for Hick... having met Mr. Dunafon a couple times, he's not exactly a Democrat-friendly candidate. Nearly 50,000 votes vs 19,500? Yeah, that's enough to swing an election. Someone please tell me again how 3rd party candidates haven't torpedoed an election from the clutches of Republicans.Quote:
Originally Posted by bryjcom
Hick is catching up!!!!
Bloomberg was on his 3rd call to the Guv, telling him. You concede now, I'll make sure every undocumented worker north of Juarez applies at your resteraunt.Quote:
Originally Posted by KAPA
This is the thing that's hilarious about you.Quote:
I'm didn't lash out at anybody. Just made an observation. And considering the libertarian track record for winning major elections, or any election for that matter, I don't think I'm the one who needs to "get over it".
You browbeat libertarians for not voting Republican because their candidates are likely to lose, as if the libertarian voters were somehow unaware of the odds.
6,662 vote difference at this point.Quote:
Hick is catching up!!!!
This is bullshit.
Boulder votes are probably been counted now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin
I saw that .... the lead is now just over 7K. This is disturbing. Hippie votes must be coming in now (or perhaps dead folks votes?).Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanWolf
Who needs sleep anyways?
Fell asleep in my chair, did Hick lose yet? What time is it?
Seems to me you'd only need to be hit in the head with a rock one time to know you don't like being hit in the head with a rock. Maybe it's different for you.
Or foreign exchange students' votes.....Quote:
Originally Posted by mousegun87
ABC has Boulder county precints at 84% reporting. Denver county is only at 80%.
http://abcnews.go.com/politics/elect...County/CO_G-00
Feck,
Interdastingly enough, I'm watching the Walking Dead with the governor.
I'm not particularly interested in debating the nuances of game theory and how it applies to voting for 3rd party candidates in this thread, and with a man of your towering intellect.Quote:
Seems to me you'd only need to be hit in the head with a rock one time to know you don't like being hit in the head with a rock. Maybe it's different for you.
Hick could get it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin
Gardner has a 62k lead and Bob had a 6-7k lead....etc how does that happen?!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey Guns
BOTH OF YOU - STOP NOW!Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin
87.2% reporting, ~9k difference.
3rd Parties.Quote:
Originally Posted by muddywings
Bob pulls ahead again by 8.7K difference.
87.2% reporting, Bob up by 8,679.
Wrong... Independents.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin13
Attachment 51811Quote:
Originally Posted by bryjcom
Or people voting with their "heart" or "conscience."
Well, I think hick will have a bad day tomorrow either way. He is out of a job and/or he now has to contend with a republican controlled senate, house and other major state offices.
As was pointed out, those same Indpendents voted at the Senate level. That doesn't explain the delta.Quote:
Originally Posted by bryjcom
This won't be answered tonight. I've got to get some sleep so I can pay taxes. G'night, folks!
FiveThirtyEight had a pretty good article addressing this a few days ago. I'll see if I can find it.Quote:
Gardner has a 62k lead and Bob had a 6-7k lead....etc how does that happen?!
I see Kiowa and San Juan counties aren't showing up on AP's map. I think Beauprez could get 3k+ or so from them.