Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0
bahahahahaha lol [Beer]
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0
bahahahahaha lol [Beer]
Winning! That's is not a bad thing to be stuck on! [Beer]Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0
NINJA
[Bounce]
I thought I would get one more post in before the lock
Quote:
Originally Posted by UncleDave
Prescient.Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0
^^^^ Spelling issues? I don't know what you are trying to say. No offence meant. I say this only out of love. [Muaha]
http://doodiepants.com/wp-content/up...b5211356a0.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Ronin13
Nice TFOGGER... but again, why ninjas always beat pirates:
http://www.motifake.com/image/demoti...1279119125.png
I refuse to pass judgment until I see her face... But the butt looks good. [ROFL1]Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin13
Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0
Its a MAN baby......
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggity
I don't want to admit this... But I'm sure I'm not the only one...
When I worked in Boulder I was driving behind this "person" on a bike.. Said person had a long pony tail coming out of their helmet...
Said person had a nice, firm ass...
I drove by... Said person was a guy.... :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0
Nope, never happened to me...I bet it happened to no one else...
Good Job, JM!
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevDen2005
[Bang] DOH!
Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevDen2005
so how do you feel about gladiator movies jm ? [LOL] [LOL]Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0
LOL, [Beer]
I'll wait for my pink username....
I just love how these threads digress. Especially when talking about sexy ninjas. I would like to get my ass kicked by one of them.[Flower]
The other one is headed that way... Maybe it can be the rival thread.... The sexy pirate thread.... Ronin! Get on that!
Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0
(Holds head in shame)
you coming out?Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by sniper7
LOL.
JM, you should have never admitted to that, man!
arrrgggghhh matey!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeon2
one more thing to mentally write down. $500 lowers, likes to look at guys asses, oh the list just gets better and better! please DO tell more[ROFL1]Quote:
Originally Posted by KevDen2005
Well, lawsuit is finally out.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014...ent-violation/
I would post the text, but I'm on the cell.
I get so tired of the ignorance of this statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperiorDG
I hope they win and every single cop involved is fired. They need to understand that just because they are in control of a situation (which was fine) they do not need to treat everybody as a cimminal until there is just cause. Ensure they are disarmed, fine, sit them on a curb, ok continue to point guns at them afterwards, search without a warrant (they had a tracking device, they were going to find the car regardless and could have protected the Constitution that they and everyone on this forum SAY they want to protect and uphold), not listen to medical concerns, not address the obvious anxiety this would cause.......... Ever point a gun at a kid being held by a parent (let the guy go if a kid is in that much risk, there was no evidence the kid was in any danger from all reports) .... Simply no. For those of you going to the cop bashing BS flag, I don't think so. If your policy allows this type of behavior it is time to disband that police dept and start over. Treating everybody as guilty before proof is not caution, it is wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by 00tec
Don't ya just love the po po....
This scenario is only possible in TV show 24.
IBTL. [Coffee]
If the gps indicated that the suspect entered an apartment building, could the police lock down the entire building and search every apartment without a warrant? I just dont know the law well enough - not trying to stir the pot here.
You mean like Boston did with the whole friggin city after the marathon bombing?Quote:
Originally Posted by GilpinGuy
But it was to protect the PEEple of Boston [facepalm]Quote:
Originally Posted by TFOGGER
There is a problem when everything turns into an exigent circumstance. It really starts putting a new meaning behind the old saying "When all you have is a hammer, everything starts looking like a nail!"
Colorado follows this interpretation defined in U.S. case law:
"Exigent Circumstances refer to situations that demands unusual or immediate action and this allows people to circumvent usual procedures. In other words emergency conditions. The circumstances are such that it would cause a reasonable person to believe that prompt action is necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers. For example when a neighbor breaks through a window of a burning house to save someone inside.
These are situations in which a police officer can take immediate action to effectively make an arrest, search, or seizure for which probable cause exists. This can be done without first obtaining a warrant. The federal 'knock and announce' statute, 18 U.S.C. S 3109 requires police officers to knock, announce and be refused entry before they break into a residence. However, exigent circumstances excuse noncompliance.
Exigent circumstances are said to exist when
(1) a person's life or safety is threatened
(2) a suspect's escape is imminent, or
(3) evidence is about to be removed or destroyed.
This is also termed as emergency circumstances or special circumstances."
You missed the point of my statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger353
Nope, I didn't. This has been the standard for the past 20 years and has stood the test of SCOTUS review. It happens frequently if not daily and it always has, but it's just now being refocused on because of this specific event or incident in Aurora. Bottomline is based on the limited information provided by the tracking device at the time, they pursued the most cautious and expeditious course of action available at that moment and the officers had PC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hound
There is also plenty of case law that covers Exigent Circumstances that were created by the government or law enforcement agency.
You did get my statement ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by trot