http://news.yahoo.com/black-americas...070000529.html
Might be a repost, sorry if it is.
Printable View
http://news.yahoo.com/black-americas...070000529.html
Might be a repost, sorry if it is.
That was very well written, Mr Ayoob sure does reiterate a lot of good points I've heard during this whole fiasco, such as:Quote:
Originally Posted by Zundfolge
"When Zimmerman lost sight of Martin, the latter was a very short distance from home. Yet in the four minutes thereafter, he had to have left that location and gone toward Zimmerman’s."
"And if Martin really believed he was in danger from the man watching him, why didn’t he simply call the police from the phone he was already speaking on?"
[Beer]
Too bad so many useful idiots that think with emotion rather than reason and obviously have zero faith in our justice system won't agree with those plain and simple thoughts.
Charles Barkley agrees with George Zimmerman verdict (at the same time obama admits he would have been high and beating on anyone that "followed" him 35 years ago (paraphrasing))
Charles Barkley has never been one to shy away from controversy, and on Thursday he weighed in with his opinion on the George Zimmerman verdict.
"Well, I agree with the verdict," Barkley told CNBC. "I feel sorry that young kid got killed, but they didn't have enough evidence to charge him. Something clearly went wrong that night - clearly something went wrong - and I feel bad for anybody who loses a kid, but if you looked at the case and you don't make it - there was some racial profiling, no question about it - but something happened that changed the dynamic of that night."
Barkley added that because of the lack of evidence, he doesn't think that Zimmerman should go to jail "for the rest of his life."
"Mr. Zimmerman was wrong to pursue, he was racial profiling, but I think Trayvon Martin - God rest his soul - I think he did flip the switch and started beating the hell out of Mr. Zimmerman. But it was just a bad situation," Barkley said.
Barkley, 50, went on to express disappointment in what he perceived as racism in the media.
"I just feel bad because I don't like when race gets out in the media because I don't think the media has a "pure heart," as I call it," Barkley said. "There are very few people who have a pure heart when it comes to race. Racism is wrong in any shape [or] form - there are a lot of black people who are racist, too. I think sometimes when people talk about race, they act like only white people are racist. There are a lot of black people who are racist. And I don't like when it gets out there in the media because I don't think the media has clean hands."
This sums it all up in one sentence.
There are a lot of black people who are racist
Statement of fact- not a racially motivated opinion: ^to this... moreso than white these days.Quote:
Originally Posted by jim
You thought wrong. Molina isn't me, so how is it relevant? I never said a 17 year old couldn't beat other people to death in a fight, just that they couldn't beat me to death in a fight, based on the fact that they'd have to get on top of me to do it, and I have 20 years of training and results indicating that it isn't anything for me to be worried about. People can't get on top of me if I don't want them to. I won't hit my head on the concrete when someone takes me down. It doesn't mean I'm tough. It doesn't mean I can throw a punch.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick-Boy
Everyone else, including you, what are you saying? That 17 year olds are a potential threat, so you should carry a firearm? We'll I already do that, and at the point that I felt threatened for my life, I would use it. If someone knocked me out before I felt threatened for my life, which I acknowledge anyone could do, what difference would it make if it were you, me, if you were carrying or not, or what your position was on this issue? You're not going to draw before you feel threatened for your life.
If I got in a fight with a lone unarmed 17 year old, or most people, I wouldn't immediately draw my firearm because I wouldn't be afraid for my life. How does my position differ from yours? How does my position differ from George Zimmerman's? Are you saying that you'd draw your weapon and use it to avoid any fist fight/scuffle with any person? I assume that's what you're saying. If not, what are you saying?
What a pussified country we live in. Half the guys on this forum wouldn't help a woman being killed outside their own door, and the other half are afraid for their life in a little fist fight.
^ don't forget he also cried when folks don't want to resell their groupbuy ammo LOL... what a drama queen.. now its woman being "killed."
Anyway, Brad Thor gave a great interview on Zimmerman's 2nd amendment right while promoting his book... Watch the video.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...rial-evidence/
http://images.wikia.com/dragonball/i...-here-meme.pngQuote:
Originally Posted by generalmeow
And he's at it again...
http://kdvr.com/2013/07/19/obama-spe...erman-verdict/
Whoa there cupcake, what half do you fit in then? I mean, just simple mathematics and all.....Quote:
Originally Posted by generalmeow