Interesting workaround... look fwd to reading a "not legal advice" answer.
-----
All you folks who mess with / troll NextDoor... might want to stop trolling.
Printable View
No, that wouldn't work for the reasons Foxtrot stated above: "Constructive possession." IOW it would be no different than if you said "I don't own these, they all belong to my wife." If you live in the house and you have unfettered access to them then it's the same as if they're yours.
Now, if the cops show up and you don't have any guns in your home, they are stored elsewhere, I'm not sure what they could do. They could compel you to surrender your guns under threat of prosecution, perhaps.
A warrant from a judge generally allows the police to do whatever is necessary to execute the warrant. I'm just guessing here but the warrant would probably read something like "The sheriff or his designated appointee is authorized to go to Joe Respondent's house at 123 Fake Street in Springfield and remove all firearms pursuant to CRS xx-xx-xxxx.x" That gives them the authority to go into YOUR house.
But it would be an interesting case if, for example, you told the cops that all your guns were at your brother Jim's house. Could they seize them without a warrant from the judge specifically authorizing them to go into Jim's house to do it? And what if Jim lives in a different jurisdiction? Is the warrant state-wide?
Better yet, what if Jim lives in a county with a pro-gun sheriff (yes they exist) and that sheriff orders his deputies not to enforce the order?
Here's another: What if a judge signs the order and the Sheriff says "I'm not going to enforce that?" I suppose the judge could hold the sheriff in contempt but how is he going to arrest him?
(I'm thinking of that memorable scene in the movie "Tombstone": Right after the gunfight at the OK corral when Sheriff Behan belatedly approaches the Earp party and says "Your'e all under arrest!" and Kurt Russel's Wyatt Earp replies "No, Sheriff, I don't think I'm going to let you arrest me today." and walks off.)
Lots of problems with this proposed law....
Until a friend alerted me to this (this morning) I knew nothing about it. I'm caught-up on this discussion ... I think.
Maybe I missed it, but what organization is actively opposing this ERPO [fertilizer] and how do we support them?