Printable View
The prosecutor should face disbarment for even bringing this case forward. Won't happen of course but this is nothing but a politically motivated show trial, nevermind the fact that it's going to ruin his life for years (if not forever).Quote:
Originally Posted by Gman
Too busy to watch the streams. Just WOW on some of the coverage though.
Based on the news, the prosecutor was bringing up the fact that he stayed silent until deciding to testify as a witness?
WHAT IN THE ACTUAL FUCK. Not only should the prosecutor be removed (never happens though) That judge needs to be removed from the bench (never happens though).
Proper action would have been immediate mistrial, and I'd have also held the prosecutor in contempt, myself.
Punitive measures are required to make it clear to attorneys that this bullshit of "We'll say it, it'll piss of the judge and we'll take our lumps, but the jury will know it".
That is as CLEAR of a violation of the 5th as there could be, and you can't uncork it. They need to shove a fully grown saguaro cactus in the prosecutors ass to make an example of him.
Watched Rekieta Law version of the live stream today, all nine hours and twenty one minutes of it today. Panel of 10 lawyers commenting on the trial as it happens, pretty great stuff.
As someone else here said, every self defender should watch today's stream for the ridiculousness of the prosecutors cross examination and the realization of what one would have faced if they were in the same position.
Send him down my way! Starting to sound like Bert lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxtArt
I think the proper way for the judge is to act upon a motion for mistrial w/ prejudice presented by the defense. Very similar to the judge only ruling on a "objection" challenge. If there is no objection there is nothing to rule on.Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxtArt
I think the defense should have asked for recess and came back asking for adjournment with the intention of filing for a mistrial. Easy for me to say while I sit behind this computer however.....
I?ve been watching the streams on Rekieta Law YouTube and it has been very interesting. When the judge tells the prosecutor, ?I don?t believe you.?, this is getting interesting.
From what I understand, they would let the defense make their case prior to declaring a mistrial with prejudice.
Binger and Krause are both idiots. I also think the defense is not doing a good job of protecting Kyle. When Binger is throwing out that Kyle was there violating curfew, the curfew charge has already been thrown out. Come on, defense, stop letting the prosecution create a false narrative against Kyle.
This!Quote:
Originally Posted by OctopusHighball
am watching it from nbc, abc, cbs, fox streaming.
Most of legal analysts from all major network have very similar comments about prosecution.
https://www.youtube.com/c/RekietaLaw
As much as video is used in trials, everyone involved seems to know little about how digital imaging, software algorithms, and display technologies actually modify the original source data.