Who do we like for SCOTUS?

The investigation pledge has completely won over Democrats who are now being completely fair and reasonable.

Or not.

https://twitter.com/ChrisMurphyCT/st...44811628810241

https://imgur.com/DcjpGdv.jpg

I wonder how the telephone conversation went from POTUS to Chris Wray and Rod Rosenstein after her sent the directive over to them to conduct an investigation. [LOL]

Bad move. Sets a precedent for future confirmation "hearings." They just keep getting worse.

Time to just tell them to shut up and follow the rules.

Tired of the enabling.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davsel

Bad move. Sets a precedent for future confirmation "hearings." They just keep getting worse.

Time to just tell them to shut up and follow the rules.

Tired of the enabling.

---

Agreed.

It's just going to get worse...


#CivilWar2020


Er... wait...

That would be bad.

The most powerful country to have ever existed is entirely engaged in discovering whether a teen grabbed a boob in the 80s.

Madness

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skip

The investigation pledge has completely won over Democrats who are now being completely fair and reasonable.

Or not.

---

Exactly. It doesn't matter how positive the outcome is for Kavanaugh it's not going to change the minds of democrats. This just emboldens them to demand more and more.

Can you imagine what the next person on the short-list of nominees is thinking about now? We're eventually gonna get to the point that republican presidents will be looking at municipal night court judges to fill seats because no one else will take the job simply because they don't want to be subjected to democrat character assassinations. They sure as hell won't want it for their families, either.

This is just more democrat maneuvering.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

The most powerful country to have ever existed is entirely engaged in discovering whether a teen grabbed a boob in the 80s.

Madness

---

There's a lot of truth to this. I'm going strictly from memory of the statutes in CO so I could be wrong. But I think the behavior she described is basically just Class 1 Misdemeanor unwanted sexual contact in CO. One of you current guys feel free to correct me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

Exactly. It doesn't matter how positive the outcome is for Kavanaugh it's not going to change the minds of democrats. This just emboldens them to demand more and more.

Can you imagine what the next person on the short-list of nominees is thinking about now? We're eventually gonna get to the point that republican presidents will be looking at municipal night court judges to fill seats because no one else will take the job simply because they don't want to be subjected to democrat character assassinations. They sure as hell won't want it for their families, either.

This is just more democrat maneuvering.

---

We're supposed to think this was all about women and the pushback against Kavanaugh was legitimate.

You're right...


https://imgur.com/73uWrKX.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

The most powerful country to have ever existed is entirely engaged in discovering whether a teen grabbed a boob in the 80s.

Madness

---

Would you say this is better or worse than pubes on a Coke can?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

There's a lot of truth to this. I'm going strictly from memory of the statutes in CO so I could be wrong. But I think the behavior she described is basically just Class 1 Misdemeanor unwanted sexual contact in CO. One of you current guys feel free to correct me.

---

This is just memory from what I've read today, but as it pertains to the original Ford accusation, worst case scenario would be "attempted rape", which at the time of the alleged offense was a misdemeanor carrying a one year statute of limitations.

About 80 minutes ago, the Women's March account called Jeff Flake a "rape apologist."

After Flake did what they wanted and brokered the one week delay. This is why these people need to be voted out. It isn't so much principle at stake as the ability to navigate Lib duplicity and win.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoNqdnHV4AAxCzV.jpg:small

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DireWolf

Correct me if I'm off on this, but didn't Murkowski lose a primary a while back and then win the in thr general as a write-in, or force a recount and come up with a bunch of votes that "got missed" originally? I seem to remember it being one of those but can't recall which offhand...

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skip

I don't remember but I do know that she is in a very delicate position.

The problem these Senators have is trying to read how this Kavanaugh thing will complication their elections. And they won't know until midterms (even if they aren't up, they'll know). They are going to have to vote first.

It's like a different level of politics!

---

Finally had a few minutes of down time to check this, and voila:
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/pol...e24606637.html


Maybe it's just me (and I try to keep the tinfoil hat buried pretty deep), but I just find this a bit interesting in-light of recent perspectives and hindsight...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skip

Would you say this is better or worse than pubes on a Coke can?

---

Is this a male or female can?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DireWolf

Finally had a few minutes of down time to check this, and voila:
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/pol...e24606637.html

Maybe it's just me (and I try to keep the tinfoil hat buried pretty deep), but I just find this a bit interesting in-light of recent perspectives and hindsight...

---

She may have even more wiggle room then depending on how this polls. I think staff is probably pretty busy trying to get a sense of that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

Is this a male or female can?

---

I don't know but I think it was a set up.

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/12...1024x1024.jpeg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skip

Would you say this is better or worse than pubes on a Coke can?

---

Depends what flavor lube she used, hypothetically.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Great-Kazoo

Depends what flavor lube she used, hypothetically.

---

[ROFL2]

Lost.

None of us are making it onto the USSC.

---

Ford's team trying to control FBI process just like they did the hearing. I hope Rape-Apologist Flake is feeling really good about this! It's also interesting watch Dim pols pretend they aren't working with Ford's lawyer/PR people. It's like compromising for peace with the PLA only to wake up to news of Hammas blowing people up.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...ificial-limits

Quote:

---

Debra Katz, a lawyer for Christine Blasey Ford, said on Friday that "artificial limits" should not be placed on the FBI as it reopens its background investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

"No artificial limits as to time or scope should be imposed on this investigation," Katz said in a statement.

---

I’m actually pretty indifferent to Kavanaugh, but the fact that they hate him SO MUCH makes me like him and want them to quit with the games, vote, put him in, and tell the Dems to STFU.

Quote:

---

Debra Katz, a lawyer for Christine Blasey Ford, said on Friday that "artificial limits" should not be placed on the FBI as it reopens its background investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

"No artificial limits as to time or scope should be imposed on this investigation," Katz said in a statement.

---

There ya go. Right now it's a week. In a few days they're gonna be screaming for more time. This is why they should've been told to take their FBI investigation and shove it up their ass. This bullshit from the democrats will never end until Kavanaugh either withdraws his nomination or Trump decides to pull him out.

It should be painfully obvious that democrats are fucking liars and will do whatever they can to obstruct, resist and generally fuck things up until they're back in power. Then, God help us all.

And this is all from the same party who locally refused to do anything about Denver Mayors sexual abuse of an officer.

Now Maryland is jumping on the bandwagon. I wondered when that was gonna happen. All this over an alleged misdemeanor that occurred 36 years ago.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FoxNews

Authorities in Maryland on Friday said they were prepared to conduct a state-level criminal investigation into sexual assault allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh -- provided that a victim comes forward.

The disclosure by Montgomery County Police Chief J. Thomas Manger and Montgomery County State’s Attorney John McCarthy came Friday, the same day that President Trump ordered the FBI to conduct a limited "supplemental" investigation.

But Manger and McCarthy noted that prosecution was unlikely in Maryland because authorities would have to apply the law that existed at the time of the offense, not the law that exists now, Baltimore's FOX 45 News reported.

“For example, in 1982, assault and attempted rape were both misdemeanors and subject to a one-year statute of limitations,” they wrote.

---

(ETA: Which is exactlly what hurley posted above.)

I honestly haven't been following this ass clown circus as closely as many of you. But with a delay, doesn't it just make the Democrats look even more childish and desperate? It'll be a week more of whining, blatant and transparent lies, and more silly accusations. We all see through this crap, even Democrats who are spouting all this nonsense. But they ARE desperate, and rightfully so, so they kinda have to do it in their minds because means and ends and all that. Right and wrong don't mean shit in politics.

If things were reversed, with the balance swinging dramatically to the left, would Republicans be using the same tactics?

Republicans have never done what democrats are doing. Not in the last 100 years anyway. The worst example the democrats can bring up is Merrick Garland. With him, McConnell just refused to schedule a vote. Nothing more. There was no character assassination and wild claims of sexual assault from anonymous victims.

Democrats have done it over and over. They have a long track record of using this tactic...during my lifetime anyway.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WETWRKS

And this is all from the same party who locally refused to do anything about Denver Mayors sexual abuse of an officer.

---

The hypocrisy is so amazing it's hard to even begin!

Hillary Clinton was just their candidate (Bimbo Eruption Squad and actual rape apologist)
Corey Spartacus Booker admitting in an editorial to being a drunk groper
Keith Ellison beat the living shit out of his side piece


"Judge Kavanaugh has a drinking problem" Yet no DUIs, public intox, etc...

Beto O'Rouke (TX) had a DUI wreck, ran from it, and lied, running right now!
Chris Cuomo (CNN) just had a DUI wreck (classic Firebird) and is talking shit about K
Ted Kennedy permanent state of inebriation including when he practiced his pregnant girlfriend problem solving skills

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

Now Maryland is jumping on the bandwagon. I wondered when that was gonna happen. All this over an alleged misdemeanor that occurred 36 years ago.

(ETA: Which is exactlly what hurley posted above.)

---

"Prepared"

This is the same "news" that's been reported for over a week. Local LE is saying they have received nothing but will look into it. Huge problem for accusers when the Dims shriek "INVESTIGATE!!!" and they won't even file police reports with the agencies that have jurisdiction.

I pointed out pages ago, they want the FBI to do the accuser's dirty work. I think this too will backfire.

The SoL analysis I've seen has been contradictory. Maybe our LEOs/legal experts can enlighten me? But it would seem LE can take a report even if SoL is up. SoL/charging determinations are made by DAs, right?

---

Internet sleuths are off of work and digging today. If you follow socials, you'll see some of it. There are discrepancies on the timing of the house remodel (which Ford claimed triggered her memories). She claimed '12 but it looks like '08 according to Google street view.

Keyser (Ford's HS BFF) has reiterated she does not recall the party or the assault. The is the second witness to indicate they are sticking to their initial story in light of an FBI investigation. The attorney tried hard to add narrative which Libs are taking to mean the witness supports Ford's claim (actually the exact opposite).

Huge argument on if this is actually exculpatory. Since Ford named Keyser as a key witness and BFF, I think it is. Had Kavanaugh named her, BFD.


https://twitter.com/emmersbrown/stat...21355030945799

Quote:

---

New: Leland Keyser’s lawyer tells Judiciary she will cooperate with FBI. Reiterates she doesn’t remember the party or know Kavanaugh, and adds: “Notably, Ms. Keyser does not refute Dr. Ford's account, and she has already told the press that she believes Dr. Ford's account.“

---

Quote:

---

“However, the simple and unchangeable truth is that she is unable to corroborate it because she has no recollection of the incident in question.”

---

If witness testimony doesn't change (and it isn't), you can expect lots of dirty tricks in the next week. Dims will need to invent more controversy.

---

Lots of talk about how Ford's name/story was leaked to media after Feinstein denied it Thursday. Speculation is that some other Dim did it. Nothing solid and media won't talk.

I think this shows how Libs really view Ford treating it this way. You can half-way respect Feinstein for not leaking (if she didn't) out of care for Ford but some Lib said "fuck this woman, we need to stop Kavanaugh!" and everyone else followed suit.


---

More info on the doxxing...

IP Address of Person Who Doxxed GOP Senators Points to Maxine Waters’s Office

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...waters-office/

Quote:

---

National Security expert David Reaboi says the IP addresses point to Maxine Waters.

[snip]

Kathleen Sengstock, a staffer for Maxine waters, posted from this IP.

---

These people are too stupid to use a proxy while posting edits on Wiki that logs IP. Yup.

Kind of makes it obvious they know this is all BS too.

With the USSC opening this week, what cases will the 9th judge be missing that has the libs riled up?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eric P

With the USSC opening this week, what cases will the 9th judge be missing that has the libs riled up?

---

The conspiracy talk is that it's Gamble.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/28/polit...use/index.html

What I have heard Libs say is that allowing state/local prosecution of crimes is a way to get Trump because they can't get around his executive authority. Of course we know that is nuts because they haven't found anything to charge Trump on in two years in any court.

A constructionist view of double jeopardy would like decide in favor of Gamble. Constitution matters and all that. Libs want us subject to multiple levels of prosecutorial discretion. Which is unsurprising given how they have weaponized government.

But everything goes back to Trump LiterallHitler.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

The most powerful country to have ever existed is entirely engaged in discovering whether a teen grabbed a boob in the 80s.

Madness

---

Exactly. It's embarrassing.

On Gamble, would UCMJ fall under Federal, or is it technically a separate entity?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CavSct1983

On Gamble, would UCMJ fall under Federal, or is it technically a separate entity?

---

Is there something you should tell us Cav?

(J/K, I don't know but great question)

---

Scope creep within 24 hours. Ramirez was not part of the "one week delay/FBI" deal.

FBI reaches out to Deborah Ramirez, Boulder woman who accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct: Report

https://www.thedenverchannel.com/new...conduct-report


Either we have another runaway DoJ or they are trying to clear as much as they can, under instruction, by next week.

I was wondering more on guys who have been convicted by civilian courts for DUI (or whatever) and then are subject to UCMJ for the same thing.

ETA: and to clarify, no, I have never been in trouble with UCMJ or civilian courts. I either never got caught (:D) or I was given the option of "paper or sweat?" by NCOs who had no desire to screw up my future.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CavSct1983

I was wondering more on guys who have been convicted by civilian courts for DUI (or whatever) and then are subject to UCMJ for the same thing.

ETA: and to clarify, no, I have never been in trouble with UCMJ or civilian courts. I either never got caught (:D) or I was given the option of "paper or sweat?" by NCOs who had no desire to screw up my future.

---

If you never pulled "Office Hours," you weren't doing it right!

Here's an attorney's answer. It sounds like technically that isn't DJ but they coordinate on the charges.

https://www.militarydefense.com/Prac...ersonnel.shtml

Quote:

---

Most people have heard of the concept of Double Jeopardy, the principle that a person cannot be convicted of the same crime twice. Military service members often believe that means that they cannot be prosecuted by both the military and civlian authorites. That belief, however, is incorrect. Civilian criminal laws and the UCMJ are different sets of laws, even if they are often similar. Service members may and have been prosecuted under both sets of law.

---

I wonder if Gamble will apply here?

---

Woman Who Confronted Flake In Elevator Runs Soros-Funded Organization

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/woman-...-organization/


This is the woman screaming at Flake that many think rattled him and convinced him to make the deal.

What are the odds she is both a victim and works for Soros?

I'm just shocked at all these new developments. Shocked, I tell you.

Attachment 76223

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

The most powerful country to have ever existed is entirely engaged in discovering whether a teen grabbed a boob in the 80s.

Madness

---

Can you imagine if it was more than a teet?
What if it was like "Hey wanna smell my finger?" then instead of Boobgate we'd have the stinky finger scandal [Coffee]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mazin

Can you imagine if it was more than a teet?
What if it was like "Hey wanna smell my finger?" then instead of Boobgate we'd have the stinky finger scandal [Coffee]

---

Close enough.
Don't worry Dave, we have the teenage boy fart scandal attached to this, the entire "Boofed" line of questioning from Mr Whitehouse.
See, aren't the Dems grand? They have all the bases covered.......

I’m surprised Whitehouse didn’t demand a sample.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CavSct1983

I was wondering more on guys who have been convicted by civilian courts for DUI (or whatever) and then are subject to UCMJ for the same thing.

ETA: and to clarify, no, I have never been in trouble with UCMJ or civilian courts. I either never got caught (:D) or I was given the option of "paper or sweat?" by NCOs who had no desire to screw up my future.

---

There's only one right answer there...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skip

If you never pulled "Office Hours," you weren't doing it right!...

---

I had a Sergeant Major gig me .1 point on proficiency when he saw my conduct marks....

Said I wasn't trying hard enough. Kind of makes me wonder what my sergeant got away with...

As to Boobgate/Stinkyfinger I just think about all the movies made in the era about those subjects...

Video evidence of Ford /Kavenaugh party:

https://youtu.be/0i6ET9DMnLk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

Video evidence of Ford /Kavenaugh party:

https://youtu.be/0i6ET9DMnLk

---

It's 40 years later...but still funny.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnnyDrama

As to Boobgate/Stinkyfinger I just think about all the movies made in the era about those subjects...

---

Like Porky's, or the passed out drunk daughter of Dean Wormer scene?

I thought it was the mayor's daughter...?

I was in high school those same years, and there was a push regarding teenage sexuality in all types of media (film, music, etc.), plus the hormones...

AIDS put a damper on that later.