Since I haven't received a reply from Guidestar, we put up this page, with our filings to the IRS.Quote:
Originally Posted by kawiracer14
http://www.rmgo.org/taxdocs
Printable View
Since I haven't received a reply from Guidestar, we put up this page, with our filings to the IRS.Quote:
Originally Posted by kawiracer14
http://www.rmgo.org/taxdocs
Depends on what you call "endorsing" gun control. The NRA opposes gun control, same as you and I... again, you obviously don't get the point I'm trying to make- because you just ragged on them again! Your last sentence here: if you were on the same side as the NRA, why make all these posts on this forum and in your messages to public via email or interviews, trash talking your ally? The military taught me a great phrase I'll share with you now: "One team, one fight." I guess you just don't get it, do you? It would be like if we talked crap on the British during WWII (officially, not what soldiers said to each other, but if Eisenhower openly trashed Montgomery). We're in this together, and guess what the prize is for second place? It's not a very nice prize. Can we really afford to lose this war? Infighting will most certainly guarantee a loss. Humble yourself PDQ or move aside and let someone who can unite the gun groups against the anti agenda give it a shot. -that's my advice. Follow it, or don't, you've already proven my money and support is better placed elsewhere.Quote:
Originally Posted by RMGOdirector
ronin, dudley has to trash talk the NRA. the NRA is his largest competitor. If he said how good the NRA was, why would anyone donate to him? He has to make you think the NRA is in bed with the gun grabbers, so you write him a check.
Really?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin13
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/21/the-nra-wants-an-active-mental-illness-database-thirty-eight-states-have-that-now/
[ROFL1]Quote:
Originally Posted by HBARleatherneck
True... he's doing it wrong... If I were in charge of RMGO I would emphasis that yes, the NRA is our friend, but they're on a more national level, meanwhile we're here fighting at the state level- it would be best to support us both for a more robust and well-rounded attack on the anti-gun agenda. But that's if I was in charge... [2cents]
Just when I start to forget why I despise you, Dudley, you make sure to remind me. Good job.
So you think that diagnosed paranoid Schizophrenics and other dangerous mentally ill individuals (with our already inept and broken mental healthcare system) should just be left unchecked to be able to purchase and have access to firearms? If James Holmes had been professionally diagnosed (that's addressing our broken MH system), and there were a system in place that limited/restricted those who had legitimate diagnosis of dangerous mental illnesses (we're not talking depression and PTSD here- no-shit mental issues that are proven to have led people to murder) you'd oppose it? The mental illness thing is a potential slippery slope, but it's also an issue that needs to be addressed, whether you accept that or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by RMGOdirector
The unintended consequences of this mental health database are incredibly dangerous.
But if you want to support that kind of gun control, go ahead.
You aren't the first person to suggest we always be nice and never say anything about the NRA. Noted. YEARS ago. Not compelled, and not going to change, as I suspect you aren't. Guess we can chalk that up to a difference of opinion, and yes, please, don't join RMGO if that's your opinion. If that's a hanging point, we don't want you as a member.
Is there another issue to solve here? I don't see one.
I need a juicebox and a nap.........
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by BPTactical
A juicebox. That's good.