Huge Nerve-Agent Chem Attack in Syria?

What has my spidey sense tingling is that it was sarin

The Japanese Terrorists made their own back in 95 ... perfectly plausible that this is a false flag by the rebels to get us involved. they know they can't when in a conventional fight without help.

ANd of course the reports that Saddam's chems went to syria .. the rebels may have captured some and used it in the false flag attack.


If the Syrian government really did do it... why are they letting the UN inspectors do their jobs with no reports of hassles? They know if they did it and it can be proven they are gunna get more cruise missiles then they can count shoved down their throats. Then the drones and fighters jets start to show up....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by roberth

What if that intel discovers the Saudis and our own oval office participated?

---

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...t-assads-regi/

UN inspector: Evidence points to strong suspicion that the Rebel did use Sarin gas.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-0...as-call-action

Boehner is a dumbass and a coward. We need an (R) leader, not some crying, (D) cocksucker.

If fucking Mc Cain and "Lindsey" are on board I`m out! These cocksuckers want to give amnesty to the illegals. McCain is where he is for two reasons his dad and gran' pa 7th from the bottom of his class. Let the muzzie cocksuckers kill each other..until they pose a threat to Israel Then all bets are off..They will retaliate.. Then Nukes will be used..

1st...

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=67c_1378210946

i bet saddam had the same kind of video

2nd.

Let me start by saying; I do not believe all of the things this gentleman/channel states. However, there are quite a few arguments that are made in his/its videos that connect the dots more so than other commentary/opinions I have seen.

Also: I am trying to find a video that the BBC published and Liveleak posted around 3-4 months ago (really hard to track it down now). It explicitly shown a BBC reporter visiting a Syrian suburb/community, wherein the locals told to her to leave, as they believed she would not listen to their point of view. Cliff note version: the locals adamantly stated (in broken English) that the Assad was not the "bad guy", and that the "rebels" were the ones creating the hell on earth for the Syrian people.

IMO; we are opening a can o' worms as I stated on an earlier post. And as a bonus; the zombies are watching Miley Cirus and ignoring our beloved government detract from certain issues such as Obamacare, immigration reform, the imploding deficit, NSA, etc, etc.

Anyway; 17 minutes of video, most of which cannot be refuted...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkamZg68jpk

Oh, and no answers from JK from RP either, aside from dodging the questions..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEcch-r28Bc

Apparently, according to Oblahblah, its the worlds fault that there was a "red line" set.

Obama stating he "didn't set a red line" is bogus.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=avQKLRGRhPU

From: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-...official-syria

...
We go on to reaffirm that the President has set a clear red line as it relates to the United States that the use of chemical weapons or the transfer of chemical weapons to terrorist groups is a red line that is not acceptable to us, nor should it be to the international community. It's precisely because we take this red line so seriously that we believe there is an obligation to fully investigate any and all evidence of chemical weapons use within Syria.
...
On your red line question, it is absolutely the case that the President's red line is the use of chemical weapons or the transfer of chemical weapons to terrorist groups.
...
But I think nobody should have any mistake about what our red line is. It is when we firmly establish that there has been chemical weapons use within Syria, that is not acceptable to the United States, nor is the transfer of chemical weapons to terrorist organizations. And the people in Syria and the Assad regime should know that the President means what he says when he set that red line. And keep in mind, he is the one who laid down that marker. He's the one who directed that we provide this information to the public. And he's the one who directed that we do everything we can to further investigate this information so that we can establish in credible, corroborated, factual basis what exactly took place.
...
So there should be no mistaking our determination not just to get to the bottom of these reports, but to send a message that as we establish the facts here and as we continue to stick to a red line that makes clear that the use of chemical weapons is unacceptable to us, the United States of America is committed to following through on what the President said, which is that Bashar al-Assad and his regime will be held accountable for these types of actions. And I think we're joined by other like-minded friends and allies who share that view.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=n6ePJXR216c