We need a state level Trump that can convey that message. Although, a threat of death would be better than actually shooting them. I know, because that is the threat they use for paying taxes on time.
Printable View
We need a state level Trump that can convey that message. Although, a threat of death would be better than actually shooting them. I know, because that is the threat they use for paying taxes on time.
FIFYQuote:
Originally Posted by DOC
But yea, sucks donkey ballz.
nope its every year. I did't stutter.
I didn't mean to justify these taxes or fees. I was just stating that I don't think it's right and law abiding citizens shouldn't have to do it. Everyone here pays for the CCW and NFA items as well. They prefer not to and if we can avoid it I think we prefer not to have additional fees for our rights.Quote:
Originally Posted by DDT951
The way it should be. And it wouldn't move the crime stats one bit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric P
But we'd be denying them a monopoly on violence which gets in the way of their ultimate goals.
In the words of a former President: "Read my lips. No. New. Taxes." They've already figured out in CO how to work around TABOR. What's really stopping them from further going after gun owners pocketbooks? It doesn't help that we have folks, here in our own community, openly stating that they'd gladly "pay a little more." That's how tyranny happens, when you keep giving them a piece of the cake without getting diddly in return. I say no more compromise, because in the end it's not compromise. They keep using that word, but it doesn't mean what they think it means.Quote:
Originally Posted by KevDen2005
Now Denver wants to bad standard capacity magazines with no grandfather clause. And they want to do it to be in line with the Colorado law. Its not more illegal if they copy the Colorado mistake. And why didn't they copy the Colorado law about preemption?
I don't have time today to respond to each comment. It's late and I need to go to bed.
But for those for the no compromise solution trying to get the mag ban over turned via the legislative means...how well has that worked out?
How well has the gun case worked out?
About the anti gunners...they compromised a little each time. They didn't what they wanted in full...So they settled for something.
Learn from the left.
Q. How does one eat an elephant?
A. One small bit at a time.
Take small wins when you can get them over no win at all.
You must be a project manager. [ROFL2]Quote:
Originally Posted by DDT951
Quote:
Originally Posted by DDT951
Where da fuk you get that information, VPC ??? Seriousely...... The anti gun faction has NEVER compromised.
But since you believe they have, here's a short read regarding the current crop of D compromise.
https://www.denverpost.com/2018/01/1...ump-stock-ban/
State Sen. Mike Merrifield, D-Colorado Springs, introduced a bill the first day of the 2018 session to make the sale, purchase or possession of a multi-burst trigger activator a Class 5 felony punishable by a one to three years in prison. The measure includes tougher penalties for subsequent violations and builds on current restrictions for firearm silencers and machine guns.
Merrifield acknowledged the politics surrounding his bill, saying he was “flabbergasted” that Republicans could oppose such a measure.
“I’m waiting for somebody to explain to me a legitimate reason why any gun owner would need to convert a legal weapon into an illegal weapon,” he said.
In an interview, Gov. John Hickenlooper stopped short of supporting a full ban on bump stocks. Instead, he said, the devices should be subject to the same stringent approval process that applies to owning an automatic weapon.
“I’m not saying ban them,” the Democrat said. “I’m just saying you put them in the same category with weapons that are, with all intents and purposes, identical.
BTW: you've conveniently avoided answering my last question in post # 68