Merry Kissmyass Nancy.....

[ETA: Didn't like the link I originally posted as it was on Facebook. Found this more lengthy one instead]

Uh, what? Have another drink Nancy. (Start watching @ 11:10. @ just after 12:00 says all we need to know,.)




Pelosi insists that she needs assurances of a "fair process" before sending the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate - and that the Senate needs to live up to their Constitutional oaths. Last time I checked the Constitution, it required processes be fair for the accused, not the accuser. Funny though, for how long have we been hearing the Democrats telling us the Constitution is an outdated document that doesn't apply today? Now, they want to pretend like what they're doing is Constitutionally sound. Not sure which Constitution they're reading, but it's certainly not the one the Founding Fathers of the United States put into place.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by theGinsue

Need Facebook to view this

https://www.facebook.com%2Fbjvangund...21225015674899

---

I get a 'blocked' response.

ETA: There you go. I thought it amazing that she's calling both the President and the Senate as "rogue". Yeah, it's everybody but you, Nancy.

http://youtu.be/s4DH3Is4YQ8

IMO, there are way too many people in government that appear to be 'not all there'.

http://youtu.be/PvwrxXMZr2M

A little levity flashback:
http://youtu.be/SHG0ezLiVGc

I need a bigger budget, not an impeachment circus. Could somebody in Congress please brief our distinguished colleague from California on the current military situation.


Attachment 79730

The conspiracy theorist in me wants to know: Given the dog and pony show in the House, taking weeks to draft articles of impeachment, then delaying referring said articles to the Senate, where they are sure to die, apparently with the collusion of the Republicans, what are the Democrats(and republicans) attempting to divert public attention away from? Epstein investigation about to reveal that both parties are rife with pedophiles? some sort of international economic catastrophe that bot parties are responsible for? Waiting for the other shoe to drop...


Note: I'm not a Trump guy. He's a classic East Coast Oligarch with the morals of an alley cat, that only assumed the appearance of being a "conservative" long enough to get elected. I can think of about 50 people more qualified to be President, including the guy who picks up my trash every week. That being said, I still think he's better than any of the Democrat contenders in the previous election cycle, or the current one.

As a share of the U.S. economy, the national debt stood at 78 percent of GDP in 2018. But the CBO says it will rise to 93 percent by the end of 2029. Again, those numbers put the ratio at levels not seen since just after World War II.

https://www.npr.org/2019/02/13/69419...dicted-to-fall

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TFOGGER

The conspiracy theorist in me wants to know: Given the dog and pony show in the House, taking weeks to draft articles of impeachment, then delaying referring said articles to the Senate, where they are sure to die, apparently with the collusion of the Republicans, what are the Democrats(and republicans) attempting to divert public attention away from? Epstein investigation about to reveal that both parties are rife with pedophiles? some sort of international economic catastrophe that bot parties are responsible for? Waiting for the other shoe to drop...


Note: I'm not a Trump guy. He's a classic East Coast Oligarch with the morals of an alley cat, that only assumed the appearance of being a "conservative" long enough to get elected. I can think of about 50 people more qualified to be President, including the guy who picks up my trash every week. That being said, I still think he's better than any of the Democrat contenders in the previous election cycle, or the current one.

---

A conspiracy of any kind gives them far too much credit. Politicians are generally stupid people, only with overly inflated egos, and leak worse than a ripped screen door in a submarine. I thought Nancy was even going to start talking a'boot her hairy legs there for a second (ref to Ginsue's video). If you want to announce something to your family, tell a politician a "secret" and they'll all get the news even faster.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gman

Those cases are from the Executive pushing back. They didn't appear to be necessary for the impeachment vote in the House.

---

Hmm
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...ment-evidence/

Quote:

---

As we suspected, albeit against much criticism, House counsel Doug Letter has responded to the DC Appeals Court arguing the forced testimony of White House counsel Don McGahn is needed for evidence in impeachment trial. [Court pdf Avail Here]

This court filing today bolsters the unspoken background motive for delayed House Impeachment Managers. The House Judiciary Committee is using impeachment as support for their ongoing effort to gain: Don McGahn deposition, and Mueller grand jury material (6e). The goal is opposition research; impeachment is a tool to establish legal standing to obtain it. Everything else is chaff and countermeasures.

---

Get articles of impeachment and vote for them...then try to get evidence. Ready...Fire.....AIM!!!!

They're doubling down and trying to make something of Russia again. Yeah, that'll work well for them.

This is just the beginning.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...e/#more-179950