Printable View
Much of today's testimony is WAY beyond my ken.
Are these attorneys doing this to somehow PROVE the validity of the videos, and the enhanced videos? In other words, they're doing this to assure the jury the videos either HAVE -- or HAVE NOT -- been tampered with to present a fake story?
Yes? No? Something different?
Most of the arguing today is over 1 blurry ass video. According to the state, it shows Kyle raising the gun before the initial pursuit starts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Tory
...and they were watching the blurry ass video upscaled on a 4K TV. What they were looking at was being modified by the TVs upscaling algorithms.
State's video expert didn't know how the software algorithm was modifying the image. That was interesting.
I couldn't see squat from that video.
And at the end of it all, they put up two grainy printed out pictures that the jury got to look at for about 30 seconds. Then that was it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gman
I went to the Amped 5 website and looked at their "Case Studies" pages. On some items (like unwrapping a 360 degree camera view) I can see legit usage for, but for other examples there is NO way those pics are done without some kind of artificial intelligence "guesstimating" of the adjoining pixels.
I would like to hear a Tax attorney and Traffic accident attorney's take on this trial.
[gohome]
Binger is a moron.
And looks like a super douche with his lame little mustache thing.
That is all.
I was able to watch bits of the trial and the prosecution continued to step on their dicks every chance they had. I think it's going to be a mistrial or he gets off.
I like the Judge, knowledgeable and solid. He does not like the media and that's fine with me! I hope the Judge/jury is not swayed by threats of demonstrations.
Two questions, 1 - What was Kyle doing with his pen during the cross examinations of other witnesses? Looked like he was punching out dots in cardboard or something, not like taking notes. Just wondering!
2 - I'm guessing he has some go-fund-me type backing to pay for his legal fees?
Best wishes for a good outcome, this kid would be dead if he hadn't reacted the way he did. Time to show the punk BLM/Antifa crowd that the law works both ways and put a stop to this crap.
I haven?t been following any of this but from what I am reading here you guys are making the prosecution sound like incompetent morons.
Is it possible they were forced to prosecute under political duress and are doing everything they can to get the case tossed or the defendant acquitted because they think the charges are garbage and the case shouldn?t have happened in the first place?
I listen to Dan Bongino's podcast. He's not an attorney, but he has lots of experience with these types of trials as an ex-cop and retired Secret Service....Quote:
Originally Posted by ray1970
Bongino thinks the DA is either brilliant ... or really stupid.
He says the prosecution has already lost this case so badly -- and they know it -- so they are actually TRYING to force the judge to declare a mistrial and save them from themselves. The judge KNOWS that's what the DA is doing and is doing HIS BEST to keep from having to do this. The judge wants the JURY to have the case and declare Kyle not guilty....