Anyone agree?
Printable View
Anyone agree?
Trolling much?
Less accurate. Less reliable (I understand that the new ones are supposedly fine but for years they were junk). Proprietary magazines. Heavier. Less accessories available.
http://cheesegod.com/wp-content/uplo...se-293x300.gif
I'll stick with an AR thankyouverymuch ... would choose a KelTec SU16 over a Mini14 too.
no kidding.
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q.../MrT_Gun-2.jpg
oh and 45 is better than 9mm which is better than 40
and Ford is better than chevy which is almost better than dodge.
anything else we can troll?
Less accurate, hmm, not with a barrel stabilizer. I'd like to do a 100 yards iron sight test.
Reliability I'd say is way better, and the long history of the action is 2nd to none for reliability.
Well, now Tapco makes good poly mags, that they say work great, like the pmags in the AR.
A little heavier, but, I can fold my stock and still fire the gun too.
Less accessories, well I guess you got me on that one, that is until you add a quad rail to a mini, then AR accessories work on it and the new models have a rail over the breech and still allow iron sights, so .....
It comes down to weight?
AR-15 rules!!
lets be honest here. you own, run or are associated with a business that sells accessories for the mini 14, so you made this thread so somehow the topic would come up so you could bring up your business. right?