Interesting article.
Of course, if this matter is pursued, everyone will know Obama was ineligible.
The Constitution means nothing anymore.
http://newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd636.htm
Printable View
Interesting article.
Of course, if this matter is pursued, everyone will know Obama was ineligible.
The Constitution means nothing anymore.
http://newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd636.htm
Cruz was born in Canada. Jindal was born in Lousiana and Rubio born in Florida. I'm sure their birth certificates are as good as our current President's birth certificate.
If Cruz was born in Canada and that's not disputed, then why the Hell is he even in the running?
Because his mother was American which made him American at birth -- the same as my brother and sister who were born at a US military base overseas. He has the most traditionally American views and is the most knowledgeable about the Constitution of any of the candidates running so of course people want to attack him for his Americanism ... [Bang]Quote:
Originally Posted by rondog
Military bases like embassies are legally American soil.
Cruz's father was working in the oil industry in Canada. This is not as simple as John McCain being born in the Panama Canal Zone, however it does appear that he is qualified to run for President.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...sident-update/
I love it. They want to investigate these men but not one of their own.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter
Cruz's father was a Cuban citizen at the time of his Ted's birth. Just as Obama's father was not a US citizen at the time of his birth.Quote:
Originally Posted by cstone
A common interpretation as to why the "natural born citizen" language is included in the eligibility clause is to prevent split allegiances - as we currently are witnessing with Obama and the musloid states.
"Natural Born Citizen" has yet to be taken up by the Supreme Court for definition, though many websites will quote the Naturalization law of 1790 that use the term "natural born citizen." However, the Naturalization law of 1795 repeals the 1790 version and removed the "natural born" portion of that statement - many websites leave this fact out of their argument.
ETA: Naturalization law of 1790 and 1795: http://www.indiana.edu/~kdhist/H105-...ation1790.html
There is a legal difference between "Citizen" and "Natural Born Citizen" and the courts need to take up the definition before another usurper gets elected.
Regardless of their supposed conservative values, I'm personally tired of hearing Cruz and Rubio talk about their roots and pushing for increased immigration. They both appear to have, and are proud of, their split allegiances.
OK, didn't know there was a military base involved. Got nothing against the guy, just wondering.
Carry on.
It's the same rule for someone who happens to be born on foreign soil to American parent(s). You can still be a natural born US citizen if your parent(s) travel abroad, while your mother is pregnant, and you happen to be born in [Insert country here]. The article was clearly written by a conservative, which is very disturbing because of the fact that it's more "eating our own" BS that folks like Kasich and Trump have been doing. Same team, same fight, let's try to remember who the real enemy is here (hint: it ain't a fellow conservative).
NOTE: My argument above is in no way stating my firm belief that Donald Trump is a fellow conservative. [Coffee]