http://ag.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/agnvg...GO_2016-12.pdf
Goes to show you that 2016 is the year of Miracles, now lets free your state next.
Printable View
http://ag.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/agnvg...GO_2016-12.pdf
Goes to show you that 2016 is the year of Miracles, now lets free your state next.
If it saves one tax dollar, isn't it worth it.
LMAO!! This just made my day.
Was that requirement that dealers contact NICS directly inserted as a poison pill? If so, genius move.
No, Bloomberg's lawyers are incompetent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rumline
But they did it in CO "right" by taxing the Constitutionally protected natural right. So what happened in NV?Quote:
Originally Posted by spqrzilla
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great-Kazoo
LOL!
Poll tax lawsuit time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip
More or less the FBI would be forced to pay for Private sale NICS checks, they said "No, we are not required to do so" and sense they are not paying for/will do it the AG said "we will not enforce it as it can not be enforced".
http://www.ammoland.com/2016/12/neva...#axzz4UGSRQDgd
The Nevada law specifically says FBI via NICS has to do the BGC, in CO it specified the state BGC system (which is why the "fee" was added). Frankly Bloomberg had help from Quislings in the CO legislature that he didn't get in NV because NV was a ballot initiative (with no input from the local legislature).Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip
Well that explains the bulk of it but I'm surprised those opportunists didn't seize the moment to create a new state level bureaucracy and make gun owners pay for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zundfolge
I think Bloomtard had help from more than just the Dems in the state house. I think they had help from CBI, IMHO. These are people who didn't even understand what gun control measure they were voting for (how firearms/mags work). It was Rhonda herself that even got confused on what weapon was used in the murder of her son.