Quote:
The case was sent back to the Michigan Supreme Court to change its decision accordingly. But the Michigan Supreme Court sidestepped Rehnquist by holding that DUI checkpoints, though now permissible under the U.S. Constitution, were not permissible under the Michigan State Constitution, and ruled again in favor of the defendant -- in effect saying to Rehnquist, "If you won't protect our citizens, we will." A small number of states have since followed Michigan's example.
Did you read why Rehnquist said that checkpoints were permissable?
Quote:
However, he continued, it's only a little one, and something has to be done about the "carnage" on the highways caused by drunk drivers.
Only a little one huh. What will be the governments next excuse to impeded the freedom of movement of the public and confiscate their vehicle for a short while?