-
NY did it AND NY Gun owners fight back
Here's the latest as i knew would happen.
http://www.nysrpa.org/files/SAFENoticeOfClaim.pdf
deprives the plaintiffs of life, liberty and/or property without due process of law, in
violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution;
G. deprives the plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws, in violation of the
Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution;
H. was passed and is being continuously enforced with the ongoing tortious intent to
harass, harm, impede, interfere with, disrupt, interrupt, and/or destroy the present and future
business and commercial activities of those plaintiffs who engage in the design of, manufacture of,
distribution of, sale of, possession of, and/or training in the safe and lawful use of firearms,
ammunition, and/or large capacity feeding devices; and
I. the legislation is impermissibly vague and overbroad.
-
best of luck to them. Hopefully they can get an a hold on enforcement while the court case moves along.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
merl
best of luck to them. Hopefully they can get an a hold on enforcement while the court case moves along.
These proceedings will be interesting, as their fight may very well become one we have to deal with.
-
Good for them. I had zero doubt this would be challenged quickly and I have little doubt their stupid law will survive the challenge.
However, this will make it to SCOTUS no matter what because we're in the right and will probably win on every level, and they think they're right and will challenge on every level. They should actually go for ALL magazine bans, including the old 10 round one (I didn't read the suit, maybe they are doing that). They should go for the whold Sullivan Law too because that's a big infringement.
-
This is a violation of the Fifth Amendment, not the Fourteenth. They had probably better get their shit together before they go to court.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jim
These proceedings will be interesting, as their fight may very well become one we have to deal with.
I just hope it can set a precedence.... especially if Prima is right and it goes all the way up to the SCOTUS, then it will effectively set the bar and state that any magazine capacity ban is a violation of constitutional rights.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ronin13
I just hope it can set a precedence.... especially if Prima is right and it goes all the way up to the SCOTUS, then it will effectively set the bar and state that any magazine capacity ban is a violation of constitutional rights.
Heller v Dc addressed some of this.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jim
Heller v Dc addressed some of this.
Yes, a big win for our rights, but we need something setting judicial precedence on magazine capacity... I'd prefer if Miller had been more robust in the ruling.
-
That's New York problem, sucks to be them, like sheep and their 7rd mag stupid shit.............they need to vote them dumb asses out of office in the next election. I have never been to New York and now I know I never will go to that State in my life time.
