anti-war protestors? When it was Bush they were on the news on a daily basis. O gets into power and they have all disappeared.
Printable View
anti-war protestors? When it was Bush they were on the news on a daily basis. O gets into power and they have all disappeared.
It's the new shot across the bow policy-doesn't count as war !! [Sarcasm2]
They've been given jobs in the Obama administration. Where you been?Quote:
Originally Posted by WETWRKS
I have asked this very question on a number of occasions.
There is hypocrisy and then there is (D) hypocrisy.
Democrats live by these mantras:
Free speech for me but not for thee
Business profits for me but not for thee
War for me but not for thee
I've seen a few on faceBook
https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphot...79810862_n.jpg
https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphot...74793896_n.jpg
They're still out there. Cindy Sheehan is still protesting. The media just doesn't talk about it anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by WETWRKS
I seen a young Obama supporter the other day in lil boulder with a sign protesting. I bet he is kicked out of the club!
The Senate hearings have had a handful of smelly aging hippie Code Pink protestors. Pathetic really.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/23/co...the-president/Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridge
Yeesh, give a warning for that pic. NSFLQuote:
Originally Posted by roberth
Protestors? War? What war? Huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridge
Sorry.
So, now that Code Pink is protesting The Loser are they OK?
or
Now that we've seen the end results of Bush's failed efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan was Code Pink right to protest?
Neither. Code Pink is always a joke. Bush's efforts in Iraq haven't failed. And the amusing giggle is that Obama claimed that he knew the "right" way to proceed in Afghanistan and has proceeded to largely abandon our efforts there.Quote:
Originally Posted by roberth
None of which has any relevance to Syria - other than the brazen hypocrisy of Obama and his supporters now willing to take the US to war over a thousand or so civilian casualties caused by chemical weapons when Saddam Hussein killed at least four times as many of his own people with chemical weapons and probably a magnitude more Iranians with chemical weapons.
Saw the title "Where are all the..........." first thing that came to mind was Blazing Saddles. Up Screwed am I. [Coffee]
http://youtu.be/TJkHykGRXrw
All seriousness this whole thing screams diversion with all the other crap going on in Obamys term. I really dont care about Syria, it is there civil war, both sides are our enemy, stay the F out of it. Amazing seeing how many different thinking groups are saying to "Stay the F out of Syria!" not just hippie war protestors.
Of course not... because the media must stay objective and not biased at all when it comes to potus criticism. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridge
+1. This REALLY a case where we don't want to support either side. Assad hates us and Israel, the rebels are 80% al Qaeda, and there's nobody that would benefit us in any way. Help the Israelis secure their borders, and let them keep Lebanon/Hezbollah from interfering, but otherwise stay the hell out until the dust settles. Yeah, people are gonna die, including innocent civilians, but our being there probably won't change that, and it absolutely will put American lives unnecessarily at risk.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skully
Eventually these military actions will bankrupt the nation. Spending too much on other countries, and not taking care of the issues within. Maybe that is the Islamist strategy...some guy with the middle name "Hussein" steers our ship onto the rocks.
The war is been kept mostly low profile by the mainstream media for the past two years, it's obvious they don't want much attention in the war.
One of the programs on CPR mentioned protesters inside the House today. They sere promptly removed but at least not avoided.
I fully agree. There is nothing we can do reguarding Syria that won't come back to bite us in the end.Quote:
Originally Posted by TFOGGER
Low profile? Which news do you watch? It's the only thing on lately.Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanWolf
Lately yeah, but I barely recall hearing about it much during most of 2012.Quote:
Originally Posted by RMAC757
And just to stir the pot, Kerry used a photo from 2003 to claim Syria use of chemical weapons.
http://www.marcodilauro.com/features...13&id=album-16
The photographer said he nearly fell off his chair when he saw his photo being used to start something noone wants.
Jesus... does ANYONE in this administration know how to do research ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mtn.man
you don't thin they woulda caught that before they let it out ??
any links to an article ( about it being used?)
looks like in fairness to Kerry .........
the BBC ran it first. I can see his people trusting the BBC as using a correct photo..
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/t...-massacre.html
put blame where it is due.. even if I hate kerry ..
Makes me wonder why Obama is asking Congress to approve military intervention -- in case shit hit the fan, blame congress, not him.Quote:
Originally Posted by clublights
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanWolf
Oh that is EXACTLY why .
Like that spineless jack wagon would take responsibility on his own ..... and this he can't blame on bush.
That's funny and probably true! Still sad how many people have gotten drunk on the "Obama Kool-Aid" and refuse to sober up. Talk to his supporters and they just think he's the greatest Mesiah, King, Grand Ruler, know-it-all, can't do wrong, best President ever, kind of guy. Damn fool walks on water to these people. You can also bet these morons will pencil his name in on the ballots next election too.Quote:
Originally Posted by jim
How is so much failure and stupidity is packed in one body is a medical mystery. That would be an interesting study.Quote:
Originally Posted by clublights