Printable View
An update from Sheriff Justin Smith confirms that Judge Krieger did cut the list down to 11 Sheriffs who provided proof in the earlier filings that they were going to be term-limited in the next year and would be subject to prosecution for their ownership of magazines exceeding 15 rounds.
Good stuff. All you need is one so I don't think the number really matters all that much. I really think this is our best chance at getting these laws overturned. Is this only for mag capacity or is the background check included here too?
I don't understand this part. Can anybody elaborate?Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanWolf
Just curious.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sheriffs in their LEO capacity are not restricted to 15 rounds, so what do they have to complain about?
Once their term is up, then they are limited to 15. 11 of them are term limited thus 11 of them can proceed. The others will be LEOs still and have no grounds... According to the judge.Quote:
Originally Posted by muddywings
Basically, they're saying that any magazines they buy now will not be allowed after their term and they will be criminals.
Sent from my teepee using smoke signals.
Normally I agree with you and your comments.... But this is frustrating.Quote:
Originally Posted by Irving
Maybe they should just give up? Fuck your rights and all that...
You don't need anything over 15 rounds, so what do you have to complain about?
Come on man...
Sent from my teepee using smoke signals.
I was answering the question.
Now that I read it like 12 times I see it.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Irving
Sent from my teepee using smoke signals.
Both are in the lawsuit.Quote:
Originally Posted by KAPA
Yeah, if those are bought after 07/01/2013.Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Ver. 2.0
I thought that the continuation of this case was supposed to be seen this month. Has it been postponed?
Probably, due to Christmas.Quote:
Originally Posted by cysoto