http://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/us-d...ons-first-use/
Not that I follow such matters closely, but I wasn't aware that we haven't actively used one until now.
Printable View
http://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/us-d...ons-first-use/
Not that I follow such matters closely, but I wasn't aware that we haven't actively used one until now.
MOAB wasn't in service until 2003, whereas Tora Bora took place in 2001.
BLU-82 was probably the one mentioned by Maj. Greer in his book.
I am alright with that.
Didn't they actually test MOAB in Afghanistan? I thought I read something years ago about 'testing' it there.. or maybe I'm thinking about the big bunker busters that were still warm when they loaded them on the plane..
Pretty sure that the weapon used early in Afghanistan was a thermobaric bomb, BLU-118B.
Glad I wasn't in one of those caves.
in caves; from Taliban to Jellyban.
I'd like to see what the results look like.
Wrong app.
Meh. We dropped a big ass bomb in the desert. Big deal.
Wake me up when we start using fuel-air bombs again.
Turn money into noise
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
They updated the article and took out my favorite part since I read it earlier today. It was the part where they said that the bomb was moved specifically to Afghanistan in order to be used there.
Whoops, wrong thread.
FFFFFFFFFFUU
UUUUUUUUUU...
Yeah...that's gonna leave a mark.
Smoked em!
We only got 36 of the bastards?
Wouldn't 10 well placed/timed 5,000 pounders deliver more effect?
Or is it a case of, it's only 9mm?
A little historical perspective: "The bomb is officially called a GBU-43 or Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB)... Weighing more than 21,000 lbs., the weapon is the largest non-nuclear bomb ever used in combat."
But, we're not the first: "The Grand Slam was a 22,000 lb (10,000 kg) earthquake bomb used by RAF Bomber Command against strategic targets during the Second World War. It was the most powerful non-atomic bomb used in the war." (WWII)
The MOAB's overall explosive yield is larger (GBU-43 at equal to 11 tons of TNT vs Grand Slam at 6.5 tons TNT equivalent).
The Grand Slam was way friggin cool. I have always thought the Lancaster was the most beautiful bomber of all time.
The Daisy Cutter and MOAB are cool, but....
http://www.fleetairarmfriends.org.uk...ted-1-copy.jpg
http://worldwartwozone.com/aussie-da...ster.thumb.jpg
The B1B has a payload of 125,000 lbs. This was chump change,
Nice pics Hoser.
Depends on the effect you're looking for. If you want to blanket a surface area for destruction, yes, they would. If you want to destroy a deeply placed fortified bunker, no. they wouldn't. This puppy was developed specifically because of the proliferation of deep fortified bunkers -- possibly including a certain chubby a-hole in eastern Asia who likes to play with missiles and nukes and nerve agents.
those are cute and all, but this is a bigger F.U..... And just because we can :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It7SQ546xRk
Someone here that makes meme's should make the following 2 pic meme:
Pic 1 of ISIS fighters, caption: We're going to Moab for vacation this year.
Pic 2 of USAF bomber, caption: No need; we're bringing MOAB to you.