A 2nd Revolution?

Printable View

11-04-2009, 18:58
Bailey Guns

A 2nd Revolution?

While watching the Thomas Paine video linked to from another thread, I noticed he mentioned a 2nd revolution. I've also heard talk lately that it's time for another revolution.

That got me to thinking. Now, this is simply a hypothetical question and I certainly DO NOT advocate overthrowing the government through violent or unlawful means. But...

...in your mind, how and where would a real, violent overthrow of a particular administration start? Seriously...what would someone do to gather the support and massive amount of resources something on this scale would require?

I've read the book "Unintended Consequences" and was fascinated by the way the "revolution" played out in the author's scenario. For those not familiar with the book, first off, read it! It's a must-read for any serious gun owner concerned with maintaining our rights and freedoms. But in the book, the hero basically starts assassinating people at different levels of government to get the message across. The movement swells and, well...just read the book.

At any rate, let's just say you had the task of planning the next revolution. How would you do it?
11-04-2009, 19:10
ChunkyMonkey

It's much less costly to educate as many people around you and to actively ask those who agrees with our principle to VOTE. The sheeple are the ones who allow this country to slide further left each day -- not the smaller number of the loud left.
11-04-2009, 19:18
Bailey Guns

Yeah, voting is great and all...but that doesn't really answer the question.
11-04-2009, 19:37
gnihcraes

...and I could be not so smart about this... but a friend is asking me about joining a militia? He says that he's heard there are militias being setup everywhere, but they are extremely quiet and hard to find... so maybe this has something to do with the next revolution? Underground or hidden militias being populated...
11-04-2009, 20:13
Dr_Fwd

Big Brother is watching us! [Peep] [Coffee]
11-04-2009, 20:18
PogoManiac7

The side that is violent first will be the bad guys.

If any sort of revolution would happen it would have to start in response to some gross overstepping of government. If not it would fail and doom the United States forever.
11-04-2009, 20:22
kidicarus13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

At any rate, let's just say you had the task of planning the next revolution. How would you do it?

Bueller?... Bueller?... Bueller?...
11-04-2009, 20:23
GreenScoutII

Yes, Unintended Consequenses was a great book. Ross could have left out the ass rape part, but other than that, a great book indeed..

I don't know what circumstances would cause the American people to revolt and forcibly overthrow the government. I think most of us are far too busy just trying to keep our heads above water financially to even notice whats going on around us. I think this is a deliberate design. I don't really believe the New World Order conspiracy theories, but it does seem like there is a concerted effort to divert the attention of the public away from serious consideration of just how far we've drifted from our founding principals.

We are allowing our rights and freedoms to be stripped from us a little at a time. We have forgotten that the origional tea party was over a 2 % tax. We effectively pay better than half our incomes in taxes, fees, and surcharges now. We seem to be a people obsessed with telling others what they can and cannot do. We waste time, money and energy fighting over weather marijuana should be legalized, or weather gays should be allowed to marry for example. We fail to notice that we shipped virtually all of our heavy industrial manufacturing capacity to China. Or, if we do notice, we buy the bullshit line we are fed that it is too expensive to build anything here anymore..

Ok, I'm starting to rant, so I'll shut up soon.

Let me just say, until we can recognize what is really happening around us and more importantly, why, there will be no revolution of any kind.
11-04-2009, 20:26
Elhuero

I wouldn't even begin to speculate.
11-04-2009, 21:53
Graves

These days The word "Treason" comes to mind.
11-04-2009, 21:56
GunTroll

Dangerous talk there! I would think the GOV could be changed with first changing peoples minds about the GOV. It worked for the other side. I would think violence on any level would be a losing venture. I think even dreaming up yourself as a modern day revolutionary is dangerous if violence is considered. Sniping out people from different levels of the GOV. ? Even if this is in a book and fiction thats just wrong and has no place on this site for conversation. What kind of talk is this???? DANGER DANGER!

Read the bible instead! I shouldn't even comment on this topic but this is the kind of crap Lefty loons and FEDS are looking for to fuel there fire against "us".
11-04-2009, 22:02
sniper7

I think it will take a massive overstepping of the .gov to the point people feel soo controlled they will no longer accept it. they would rather have death than to continue living under such rule.
the sad part is looking at the UK or most European countries and see what they deal with yet they continue on their paths. I know America won't go that far since we are soo ingrained with freedom, but I also fear with each generation it is being lost little by little.
11-04-2009, 22:07
Ridge

Violence is the easy way out - but it's also a sure path to discrediting everything you stand for.
11-04-2009, 22:20
GunTroll

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ridge

Violence is the easy way out - but it's also a sure path to discrediting everything you stand for.

So wise you are.
11-04-2009, 22:24
Ridge

Quote:

Originally Posted by GunTroll

So wise you are.

Meh, copied it word for word from Glenn Beck's Common Sense[Flower]
11-04-2009, 22:27
GunTroll

You Fatty fat fat so Beck listener! Hold your head in shame!
11-04-2009, 22:29
Pancho Villa

The thing about a (mostly) democratic society (yes, we are a Republic, I know) is that if you have the numbers to do a successful violent revolution, you have the numbers to be such a huge voting bloc in elections that you'll be pandered to politically anyway. When that pandering consists of "Ya'all leave us the eff alone, y'hear?" it makes it even easier, because you're not demanding handouts, you're demanding the cesessation of handouts.

If any violence did happen in the US, civil war style, it would probably come from the critical mass of people wanting to be left alone being reached in a single state which would subsequently vote itself out of the Union. Now, I don't know how much history y'all know, but the last time that happened it didn't work out so hot for the seceding side, but who knows. Times a-change.

There are a lot of preconditions for a successful effort to change the culture. Violence - if it must occur - will be the very last thing, and will be in self defense.

Also, to the fine folks talking about militias - the difference is, during the revolutionary war, 2-5% of the population was available to be out in the field as militia at any one time. To besiege a fairly sizeable army for the time - almost 10,000 men strong - that occupied Boston, the militia answered the call, with no central, guiding authority except their love of liberty, to the tune of 20,000 men. Today, you'd be lucky if 200 crazies who never drill showed up. As a general rule, my thought on militias that almost no one who wants to be in one should be allowed in one. But perhaps my intellectual snobbery is showing.
11-04-2009, 22:32
GunTroll

We just got schooled. Again!
11-04-2009, 22:43
Pancho Villa

Sorry to double post, but I wanted to add:

Studying the culture (especially the differences from then and today) from that of the revolutionary war to that of today is a hobby of mine. In general, I believe that a man from there would consider modern man to be quite an unprincipled coward, and probably stupid to boot (surprisingly, from what little data I have been able to gather, I think that most grown men of the time were far better educated and a higher percent of the population were "thinkers" than are now.)

Of particular relevance to the interests of this board, though, are the law enforcement and militia systems of the time. Everyone knows the US didn't have much of a standing army for the longest time; fewer people know that police officers as we know them today were also unheard of in the colonies. What is also not common knowledge is the fact that the difference, technically, between your powers and a policeman's powers is that a policeman can issue traffic citations. This is a legal legacy from those times - though, de facto, a policeman has a lot more leeway because courts often give them much more benefit of the doubt than they do to us regular folk.

Essentially, if someone robbed you, you were expected to run the guy down, beat him to submission, and take him to the nearest court house. Your neighbors were expected to help in this and come by as witnesses. A European who came to America shortly after the revolution was amazed (to paraphrase) at two peculiar things - the complete lack of government agents and the complete lack of people who got away with crimes. There were numerous (private) investigative agencies who made it their mission to track down, capture and take to the authorities people who got away with crimes. They created, of their own accord, methods of communicating across their respective jurisdictions, so that fugitives could not get away simply by getting out of the county. And it was such a successful system that the US didn't really see widespread use of police officers until after the civil war.

This alone tells you how different the people back then were compared to now. I think I could count on a lot of folks here, even ones I have disagreements with, to stop what they were doing and help me tackle and subdue some jerk who tries to take my stuff; but I don't think its something you could expect in general, let alone people volunteering their time to track down criminals, to make their own neighborhoods safer.

Now, some of this is undoubtably due to problems put in by the government. The effective tax rate back then was pretty close to 0%, as opposed to the 60-75% of our income thats confiscated in various ways by the government today. People could work a lot less (even when their work was less productive) and still make a decent living. But I also think al ot of it is a short-sighted (NOT selfish - unless you take 'self interest' to mean 'my immediate self interest while ignoring how my actions harm me in the long run,' which I think is silly) view of life. Today the pull of the "now" is strong in your average person's mind - back then I believe many more people thought about the long term, about consequences and principles. So they could see how it was in their advantage to put 4 hours a week into helping the local investigative agency out, or helping run down a pickpocket. The obvious selfish (ie self-benefitting) nature of those actions are clear to anyone who thinks beyond the immediate moment - but many people today do not think beyond the immediate moment.

To a colonist of the time, helping to hunt down criminals and serving in the militia were not things done out of blind duty, selflessly, for the good of "the community." The colonist knew that his own interests lay in living in a safe, well protected society; and that nothing is free ("God said: take what you want, and pay for it.") He knew that safety, order and peace were not something you counted on appearing from thin air, but something you did your part to create, because it is obviously in your own self-interest to live in a safe, sane society. The penalty for not coming out during a militia callout was pathetic - something like a traffic ticket today - but the militia came out, voluntarily, in droves.
11-05-2009, 00:58
MichiganMilitia

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pancho Villa

I think that most grown men of the time were far better educated and a higher percent of the population were "thinkers" than are now.)

I agree... Progression of culture in America has created an environment that encourages the people to become sheeple. Being a thinker is what will set you apart and place you far above the rest of the sheeple.

And thank you for the history lesson. These things are important to know and are all too often left out of history lessons at our (tax dollar funded) public schools.
11-05-2009, 03:53
bjl913

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr_Fwd

Big Brother is watching us! [Peep] [Coffee]

Quote:

Originally Posted by GunTroll

Dangerous talk there!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ridge

Violence is the easy way out - but it's also a sure path to discrediting everything you stand for.

+100 to these 3...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pancho Villa

EVERYTHING PONCHO SAID!

If i were to comment, you took the words out of my mouth... stop doing that poncho... please? lol [Beer]