Illinois State Sen.: "...maybe it?ll just be a confiscation"

IL Sen. Taunts Gun Owner: Forget the Fine, Maybe We?ll Just Take Your Firearms



https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...your-firearms/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts08U2673EI

[QUOTE][The gun owner then asked, ?If I get to keep it?if I pay a fine and register it?then, how dangerous is it in the first place and why do you need to ban it all??/QUOTE]

Damned good question!

Quote:

---

People in attendance applauded the gun owner?s point and once applause died Morrison said, ?Well, you just maybe changed my mind. Maybe we won?t have a fine at all, maybe it?ll just be a confiscation and we won?t have to worry about paying the fine.?

---

Anyone still think this is about "good policy?" These people are drunk on power. I legitimately fear what they would do if they succeed in banning guns.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skip

<snip> I legitimately fear what they would do if they succeed in banning guns.

---

this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS9W7IPlO_0

From Mad World News article:

Quote:

---

The exchange between Sen. Morrison and a very concerned gun owner was caught on video by the Illinois State Rifle Association and was tied to proposed fines for keeping commonly owned semiautomatic firearms in one?s home.

The concerned gun owner pointed to SB107 and said the purpose of it was ?to take away [his] semiautomatic firearms.?

Morrison then interjected that the purpose was not to take them, but to prevent any future sales.

---

Bold by me for emphasis. The article did not state exactly what she said, just that she "interjected".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by crays

[snip]

Bold by me for emphasis. The article did not state exactly what she said, just that she "interjected".

---

She interjected that she would/could change her mind and just confiscate the guns. Kind of a big deal.

That's what these people think of themselves; they have absolute authority and our ability to negotiate our rights away is a privilege.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skip

She interjected that she would/could change her mind and just confiscate the guns. Kind of a big deal.

That's what these people think of themselves; they have absolute authority and our ability to negotiate our rights away is a privilege.

---

I read that part Skip. I was referring to the line from the article where she interjected about it preventing future sales. I was kind of surprised there was no quote.

There was a time when a politician would suffer immediate and severe consequences in certain places in this country for saying something like that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

There was a time when a politician would suffer immediate and severe consequences in certain places in this country for saying something like that.

---

https://themadstatist.com/wp-content...ing-Bodies.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by crays

I read that part Skip. I was referring to the line from the article where she interjected about it preventing future sales. I was kind of surprised there was no quote.

---

Ah, gotcha.

The quote is so incendiary it's exclusion would have to be intentional. THAT IS THE STORY!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

There was a time when a politician would suffer immediate and severe consequences in certain places in this country for saying something like that.

---

She's as calm as a Hindu cow.

Really makes one think about the folks they call extremists and fascists/Nazis. These are the most restrained Nazis I've ever seen.

BUT, BUT. No One Wants to Take Away Your Guns.

We just ask for common sense gun laws.

Democrats really can't wait to put their boot on the neck of the people.

This is why they need gun control because without it, the instant they get what they want the people rise up and kill them.

Sums it up nicely:

The only reason any politician promotes restricted public access to firearms is because they intend to do things for which they rightly should be shot.

Another one lets the mask slip...

(She deleted these tweets and locked her account)

https://twitter.com/kungfuman316/sta...54878273658881

https://imgur.com/naFbIDZ.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skip

Another one lets the mask slip...

(She deleted these tweets and locked her account)

https://twitter.com/kungfuman316/sta...54878273658881

https://imgur.com/naFbIDZ.jpg

---

No bitch, your the EXACT reason we have the 2nd.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skip

Another one lets the mask slip...

(She deleted these tweets and locked her account)

https://twitter.com/kungfuman316/sta...54878273658881

https://imgur.com/naFbIDZ.jpg

---

She also has no grasp of the meaning of "well regulated" in 18th century terminology.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by .455_Hunter

She also has no grasp of the meaning of "well regulated" in 18th century terminology.

---

Agreed. If the left wanted to really strictly interpret the "well regulated Militia" part they'd have to issue us rifles, ammo and provide free public shooting ranges all over the place.

Hmm, it would appear she is violating the law with making her account "Private"

“ “The First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise‐open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees,”


https://firstamendmentwatch.org/trum...twitter-block/

https://clairecelsi.com

https://www.instagram.com/clairecelsi/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

Hmm, it would appear she is violating the law with making her account "Private"

“ “The First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise‐open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees,”


https://firstamendmentwatch.org/trum...twitter-block/

https://clairecelsi.com

https://www.instagram.com/clairecelsi/

---

Silly you...

Those rules only apply to conservative political officials.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by .455_Hunter

She also has no grasp of the meaning of "well regulated" in 18th century terminology.

---

I think we're probably past a rational and accurate interpretation of 2A.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by .455_Hunter

Silly you...

Those rules only apply to conservative political officials.

---

Your right, there I go trying to toss logic and law into a lawless and illogical game.....