Printable View
https://www.thedenverchannel.com/in-...o-many-weapons
Quote:
(AP) Democratic presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke's recent vow to take away people's AR-15 and AK-47 rifles raised one big question: How is it possible to round up the millions of such guns that exist in the United States?
Slightly less biased than normal, maybe. Fair? No. It was still completely one sided on the argument, just discussing how it might be difficult to ban weapons.
It's one of the few I am seen that actually acknowledges the magnitude of "military style semi-auto" ownership, and not just implying they are owned by a few 10,000 basement ogres and wannabe psychopaths.
If only more liberals thought this way.Quote:
"Constitutional rights aren't based on what you like. What's the slippery slope of this?" said Lara C. Smith, the national spokeswoman for the Liberal Gun Club, a nonprofit group of liberal gun owners. "If they're going to take away these rights, what other rights are they going to take away?"
Pre 6/2013 - good start, not close to being fair.
Pre 1986- starting to be slightly fair.
Everyone talks about how many ARs have been sold, but I don't think I've seen figures for how many AKs have been imported. I'm sure it's out there, I just don't remember seeing it.
That retired ATF puke David Chipman is a real piece of shit.
He worked for the ATF. Automatic POSQuote:
Originally Posted by brutal
If the article calls it anything other than "confiscation", then it's not telling the truth...
Bans and confiscation will work about as well as prohibition did.
This. In. Spades.Quote:
Originally Posted by MED