California Mass Shooting- Biased Editing?
https://www.latimes.com/california/s...-mass-shooting
10 killed, 10 injured.
When I first read the story this morning about 6:00, it said, "They said there was a man with a machine gun in the area. The shooter, they said, had multiple rounds of ammunition, so that once his ammunition ran out he reloaded, Choi said."
I looked at it again about 7:30 and it had changed to, "They said there was a man with a semiautomatic gun in the area..."
I send an email to one of the writers asking why the change, since they were quoting witnesses and the police have not identified what weapon was used.
I am pretty sure why it was changed- politics. Machine guns are illegal. Semi automatics are a current hot button issue for leftists. Claiming a semi auto was used is likely to stir up more emotional support for the banning of the guns.
I could be wrong and there was new information presented between the times I read the article.
But I doubt it.
Just my opinion! (MSM sensationalism)
We can't pass judgement yet, because the whole story isn't out in the open. My understanding is there was a domestic violence incident that occurred before the shooting. Usually, the initial reports are correct. Then come the speculations and opinions, which will distort our view of what really happened. Remember the average American reads at the 7th grade level.
Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
Additional news link below:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ca...58fbb26405db53