Palin is an idiot

Her version of Paul Revere: "He who warned, uh, the … the British that they weren't gonna be takin' away our arms, uh, by ringin' those bells and, um, by makin' sure that as he's ridin' his horse through town to send those warnin' shots and bells that, uh, we were gonna be secure and we were gonna be free … and we were gonna be armed."

And it's certainly not the first time she demonstrated her ignorance of American history and her grasp of world affairs is pathetic.

I don't understand her appeal at all....

How anyone can consider her a viable president is beyond my comprehension.

If she couldn't stand the heat of being a media target as Governor how does anyone think she could handle the pressure of being president?!?!

No, I'm not a democrat, I consider myself an independent of very conservative bent. Good Lord, I hope the Republicans can find somebody worth a damn to run... But Palin ain't it! Obviously IMNSHO.

Thanks for letting me rant....

Rant on, she is an idiot. What did the republicans see in her anyway?

Um um um um ah ah ah um um havent you um heard um um the masses um um like idiots [Beer]

I'd do her.

It's sad, really, that someone so prominent in the political arena can be so painfully dumb to listen to. Sad, but oh so common. At least felony charges aren't being brought against her. Yes I'm looking at you, Mr Edwards. No wonder people are so disenfranchised with politics.

wow. warned the British...wow.

And Paton was a German Field Marshal, and he carried a Luger <that's less offensively wrong!


I don't think they can blame the liberal media for this one. She should find a hole, this whole fame thing isn't doing well for her.

what?

Hey- at least she has a basic idea of the concept.

More than most of the Lefties I would imagine.

How is this any different than one who thinks we have 57 states...............

If the media was unbiased O'blunder would be a chew toy. It is pathetic that the left has idiots like Rangel, Edwards and Weiner and although they get an honorable mention in the media when they eff up yet if somebody on the right rips a fart in church it is major news.

Not defending SP, I like that she seems honest and says what she feels but I will agree, she isnt Presidential material.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guylee

I'd do her.

---

^^^^^ She's HOT!! And likes guns "AR-15" and Hunts!! Daddy like. [Tooth]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

Hey- at least she has a basic idea of the concept.

More than most of the Lefties I would imagine.

How is this any different than one who thinks we have 57 states...............

---

Perhaps true...None of them should be President.


Hell ignore proof of citizenship, make turds running for office pass the basic citizenship test!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guylee

I'd do her.

---

How bout a threesome?

http://d.yimg.com/a/p/ap/20110602/ca...Pmr3qLgrd5qw--

Threesomes are just way too much work unless the girls are also into each other.

Just sayin'.

Anyway, "my chimp is less retarded than your chimp" is a poor defense. Palin isn't qualified to be dog catcher, let alone president. Neither is Obama.

More's the pity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pancho Villa

xxxx isn't qualified to be dog catcher, let alone president. Neither is xxx.

More's the pity.

---

Are any of them....?

Anymore, I'm pretty much of the opinion that if they are in Washington or trying to get there, they are of extremely poor character and I wouldn't want my daughter/son/relatives to date 'em....

When the choice is who you're going to vote against instead of voting "for", it's a sorry state of affair... the last 15-20 years...

probably time to stop drinking [Beer] or posting [Rant2]......

Ron Paul..........the only worthy candidate. Which is precisely why he doesn't have a chance. [Bang]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stevelkinevil

Ron Paul..........the only worthy candidate. Which is precisely why he doesn't have a chance. [Bang]

---

I have serious issues with Ron Paul's foreign policy.

The US did not "cause" the Muslim world to hate us, any more than we "caused" Japan to hate us - ie, two mutually exclusive ideologies (in this case, liberal capitalism vs the islamic state) are just going to collide.

Just leaving the area won't solve the problem.

Neither will staying there and nation-building, enshrining democracy to the point where both Iraq and Afghanistan's constitutions put Islam as the state religion and the highest law of the land. The Japanese tried to pull that BS post-WWII - making only cosmetic changes to the Meji constitution and essentially keeping the state religion (shinto, with the Emperor as a god-figure) and state structure as it was. We told them where to stick it and MacArthur wrote their constitution for them. We all know how that turned out.

All we're doing now is sowing the seeds for the next war, the way we are handling things.

Personally, I don't think Palin will run for Pres., regardless of her current "campaign tour". She's a damn good-looking woman that is currently riding high on the wave of popularity, and IMO she's raking in as much cash as she can now while the gettin's good. Sarah Palin is in this for the Palin bank account, IMO. Books, speaking engagements, TV shows....cha-ching, cha-ching.

Think about it.....they have a large family and live in Alaska, one of the most beautiful places on Earth. Does anybody really think that whole tribe would move to the shithole of Washington DC? With a handicapped toddler? I sure wouldn't, oh hell no! And the family staying in AK wouldn't work, she couldn't commute back and forth, and she's too much of a Mom to be away from her family like that.

Being what she is right now pays a LOT better than being a governor or a President.

I may be just a horny old bastard, but I could sure go for a babe who was as easy on the eyes as she is. Without the herd of kids though.

None of the above for President?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pancho Villa

I have serious issues with Ron Paul's foreign policy.

The US did not "cause" the Muslim world to hate us, any more than we "caused" Japan to hate us - ie, two mutually exclusive ideologies (in this case, liberal capitalism vs the islamic state) are just going to collide.

Just leaving the area won't solve the problem.

Neither will staying there and nation-building, enshrining democracy to the point where both Iraq and Afghanistan's constitutions put Islam as the state religion and the highest law of the land. The Japanese tried to pull that BS post-WWII - making only cosmetic changes to the Meji constitution and essentially keeping the state religion (shinto, with the Emperor as a god-figure) and state structure as it was. We told them where to stick it and MacArthur wrote their constitution for them. We all know how that turned out.

All we're doing now is sowing the seeds for the next war, the way we are handling things.

---

+1
Damnit Pancho you're not supposed to make me agree with you [Bang]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SRG720

The presidency no longer matters because Bamo has made himself General Secretary..

---

Is this sarcasm or did he actually pump out an EO for this? If you tell me you aren't joking, I'd believe it.

I dont trust any of them...

no public servants, all self servants

I agree that Palin is an idiot. But there are many like her in DC.
But it doesn't really matter who is president because they are just a puppet for the big money and corporations that really run the show.

I'm an independent
I'd like to see Obama and his regime take a nice long hike next year but so far the Republican candidates are morons--they better regroup and get their chit together quick or we're gonna be stuck with what we got now for another 4 years.
I'm damned sick of voting for the lesser of 2 evils because the lesser of 2 evils is still evil

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Leobj

Her version of Paul Revere: "He who warned, uh, the … the British that they weren't gonna be takin' away our arms, uh, by ringin' those bells and, um, by makin' sure that as he's ridin' his horse through town to send those warnin' shots and bells that, uh, we were gonna be secure and we were gonna be free … and we were gonna be armed."

And it's certainly not the first time she demonstrated her ignorance of American history and her grasp of world affairs is pathetic.

I don't understand her appeal at all....

How anyone can consider her a viable president is beyond my comprehension.

If she couldn't stand the heat of being a media target as Governor how does anyone think she could handle the pressure of being president?!?!

No, I'm not a democrat, I consider myself an independent of very conservative bent. Good Lord, I hope the Republicans can find somebody worth a damn to run... But Palin ain't it! Obviously IMNSHO.

Thanks for letting me rant....

---

Seriously? An idiot?

So what have you accomplished in your life that qualifies you to pass judgment on her intellect? How many states have you governed? In how many cities have you been elected mayor?

So she bumbled a few lines in a speech. Big deal. Every president I can remember has done that. Even the "smart" ones like Obama.

The leftist media likes to portray Palin, and every other conservative, as a bumbling moron and most people lack the critical thinking necessary to realize that. If the media started telling everyone the sky was pink, eventually you'd have a bunch of people running around talking about how pink the sky is.

They're masters at this and also convinced everyone that Bush was an idiot. A guy with an Ivy League graduate degree, fighter pilot, manager of several businesses, etc...

Palin may, or may not, be the sharpest knife in the drawer. But when was the last time any mainstream media outlet mentioned how smart a viable conservative candidate was? Yeah...I can't remember either.

She wouldn't be my first choice as republican candidate for president. But I'm certain she could do just as well as Obama or any number of other candidates on either side of the fence.

Yeah...Palin's an idiot all right. All the way to the bank. I wish I was that stupid. [/sarcasm]

And Ron Paul is a disaster in the making as president.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

Seriously? An idiot?

So what have you accomplished in your life that qualifies you to pass judgment on her intellect? How many states have you governed? In how many cities have you been elected mayor?

So she bumbled a few lines in a speech.

---

Bumbled! Please...Warned the BRITISH, Paton was a Nazi and Lee was a Union man, its a downright offensive misunderstanding of American history! She said it, the Media didn't put those words (almost, more like noises) into her mouth. I take pride in my history, and expect the same from someone looking to run this country.


What I have I done that qualifies me to be president, well-

- A. I'm not running for president, so I am not exposed to the same scrutiny. That logic falls flat, the next time someone makes a slide at Pres. Obama, I expect you to jump on that one, no one can say he hasn't done a lot that many of us haven't, unless someone on here can be called Dr. Professor Senator Esq. I didn't know about.

- B. I passed fifth grade, I haven't cheated on my wife, I don't hate America, I view service as something I do for the people of this country, not something to make me famous, I won't change my opinion by miracle depending on what voting block I need to get elected, and I can read. Vote BigMat.



I should add, I am frustrated. Pres. Obama has lied about the things that mattered to me, he has done nothing for the economy of note, and he has betrayed his base ( not that it affects me, but a little honor would be nice) and more. The economy is in shambles, the war drags on, and the light at the end of the tunnel grows dimmer. He should be easy to beat, and yet, the GOP puts up a gaggle of turds and expects me to be happy! There are smart accomplished people in the GOP and in third parties, and none of them run, we get cheaters, patronizers, and fools...and Ron Paul, who I can't figure out for the life of me. Ugh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

Seriously? An idiot?

So what have you accomplished in your life that qualifies you to pass judgment on her intellect? How many states have you governed? In how many cities have you been elected mayor?

So she bumbled a few lines in a speech. Big deal. Every president I can remember has done that. Even the "smart" ones like Obama.

The leftist media likes to portray Palin, and every other conservative, as a bumbling moron and most people lack the critical thinking necessary to realize that. If the media started telling everyone the sky was pink, eventually you'd have a bunch of people running around talking about how pink the sky is.

They're masters at this and also convinced everyone that Bush was an idiot. A guy with an Ivy League graduate degree, fighter pilot, manager of several businesses, etc...

Palin may, or may not, be the sharpest knife in the drawer. But when was the last time any mainstream media outlet mentioned how smart a viable conservative candidate was? Yeah...I can't remember either.

She wouldn't be my first choice as republican candidate for president. But I'm certain she could do just as well as Obama or any number of other candidates on either side of the fence.

Yeah...Palin's an idiot all right. All the way to the bank. I wish I was that stupid. [/sarcasm]

And Ron Paul is a disaster in the making as president.

---

Do the same rules apply for criticizing all of our elected, public Masters, or is it just the "conservative" ones that we need to be equal to or more successful then?

Did anyone one here graduated from Columbia University and Harvard Law School and then teach constitutional law for 12 years? If not, you are not worthy(according to the, "you have not done anything to equal the one being criticized rule") to criticize B. Hussein Obamie and his "knowledge" of the law and Constitution, because he has done these things and you have not.

Sorry, it is not my rule. I'm just trying to enforce it.

Going back to the original post, what about Jim Demint? It's looking like he might announce and he's promising. One of only 10 that voted against the extension of the mis-named "Patriot Act" and an A+ rating from GOA.

As for Palin, if by chance she does get the nomination, look at her running mate since he or she will be the president after she takes her ball and goes home 10 or 11 months into her term. Maybe then she can go on another bus tour.

"Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job."
-Douglas Adams

I find this even more fitting today then when I first read it.

I call it "obsessed with celebrities syndrome" Most droll boring dumbass American citizens only know celebrities. They're too stupid to pay attention to real current events. They just know "American Idol" fags, or Skoochie or whatever that pigs name is from the "Jersey thing".

That is a major problem today and politicians and business's capitolize on it. All kinds of shenanigans are being pulled because everyone wants to be entertained and not have to worry about world affairs, "cuz I jus wanna feel good and jus wan the govments ta take care of me"

And in my opinion, that is what Palin is doing. Can't blame her for making a buck....

I like Palin but only in that she brought a renewed vigor to the republican party. I don't like her for president, but I think she would be just as good as Barry. Will she run for president? Probably, it brings more attention to her and more speaking engagements - basically she becomes more Palin.

Now the problem with Palin is that she has really helped put the Tea Party on the map. This is a good thing because it's the "we're fed up" conservatives, but the Tea Party is a bad thing IMHO because it's splitting the vote all over the map - several elections were lost to dems because the battle was between Tea Party and Republican. I think the Tea Party is given far more credit than they deserve and that's gone straight to their heads, drunk with popularity and flush with cash. If they become the counter to MoveOn.Org and those types then great, but if they split the vote then we're screwed.

Romney will not have a chance (again), Paul will not have a chance (again), Palin will get close but not get past the primary (but guarantee she'll be a third party and that will split the vote). I'm, right now, in for Pawlenty, but we'll see where that goes in the coming months.

I concur. Palin is an attempt to sway the real TeaPartiers to the GOP

She is a high functioning retard....

BigMat for President!!!![Luck]

Already said it before but will say it again....

MAZIN & Morgan Freeman for President, Morgans down and I'm up to it. Long golf trips, some head in the oral office, print some extra cash. Oh wait did I say that out loud?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rust_shackleford

I concur. Palin is an attempt to sway the real TeaPartiers to the GOP

---

+1^

Is she an idiot no. But right now Ivy League looks real light weight and does nothing for us. Does she have more common sense than most in DC, you betch ya. Does she scare all the belt way panty wastes oh yea. No golf for her she would be shooting, hunting and fishing with the secret service shooting full autos with Ted Nugent photo ops.

Everyone has miss spoken about something they should know and it gets harder knowing every word you speak is looked at through a microscope. I cut her slack knowing this especially from the media nowdays.

Is she running? No, I believe she is trying to energize the base so the candadates start off with a solid conservative focus and hopefully bringing the most conservative candidate to the forefront to run against odumbo.

We have several good candidates that may not have everything but are far and away better than odumbo. Until Paul Ryan or Marco Rubio or Bobby Jindle come up we would do well with Tim Pawlenty or Romney. Herman Cain also has started to get traction. I really like Paul but he is more hated by the media than Palin.

It is early on and lots of mud slinging and vetting.

Lastly would most men on this forum say no to someone like her if you already not that blessed?

she isn't the brightest. im not a fan. but personally i don't think those types of things should eliminate someone from president. you can make sound national decisions with basic common sense. in fact in some ways thats what we are missing. hey we could keep with tradition and go with slick, smooth talking salesmen who cheat on their wives, lie for a living and don't know what its like to be a normal citizen in america. why is those people are more acceptable to be president? because theyre rich? because they went to an ivy league school? im tired of zero common sense presidents. reagan wasn't a genius by most standards. he just had common sense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Leobj

I don't understand her appeal at all....

How anyone can consider her a viable president is beyond my comprehension.

---

Compared to the jackass that currently has the job I'd be perfectly happy with Palin taking his place ... hell I'd be perfectly happy with TRIG Palin taking his place.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zundfolge

Compared to the jackass that currently has the job I'd be perfectly happy with Palin taking his place ... hell I'd be perfectly happy with TRIG Palin taking his place.

---

This ^^^

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zundfolge

hell I'd be perfectly happy with TRIG Palin taking his place.

---

[LOL]

I don't think the press, the left and a portion of the right abhor Palin for WHO she is, but rather WHAT she symbolizes.

A lot of traditional American values and beliefs.
This is a pothole in the road for the "Progressive" ideology and they can't stand her poking the bees nest.
Her ideals scare them.

She may not always articulate herself the best but at least you know it is her thoughts and words as opposed to a scripted teleprompter address that some overpaid twit composed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

[LOL]

I don't think the press, the left and a portion of the right abhor Palin for WHO she is, but rather WHAT she symbolizes.

A lot of traditional American values and beliefs.
This is a pothole in the road for the "Progressive" ideology and they can't stand her poking the bees nest.
Her ideals scare them.

She may not always articulate herself the best but at least you know it is her thoughts and words as opposed to a scripted teleprompter address that some overpaid twit composed.

---

This isn't true, I don't care what her values are.

I am reasonably sure She couldn't pass a citizenship test, that's why I don't like her.

I know a ton of liberals, they are fine with very socially conservative people, but Sarah Palin makes her own bed. Can't blame the media, she said it, she puts herself out there. Her words, her fault. Its not like they are in her yard at 2 in the morning quizzing her, she was asked a question at a press function, that she went to, and her running, unedited response was fully wrong, again. Bumble, please, helped the British, that's completely wrong, 180 degrees wrong, of a fairly simple concept that most 13 years olds should be able to handle.

After that, don't get me started on Service, because I don't like her for a clear misunderstanding of what service means. It doesn't involve quitting half way into a known term, because you have a shot to make more money and be on TV. She has proved all other listed reasons to be false, except for maybe the ethics violation one, that could be it too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BigMat

This isn't true, I don't care what her values are.

I am reasonably sure She couldn't pass a citizenship test, that's why I don't like her.

I know a ton of liberals, they are fine with very socially conservative people, but Sarah Palin makes her own bed. Can't blame the media, she said it, she puts herself out there. Her words, her fault. Its not like they are in her yard at 2 in the morning quizzing her, she was asked a question at a press function, that she went to, and her running, unedited response was fully wrong, again. Bumble, please, helped the British, that's completely wrong, 180 degrees wrong, of a fairly simple concept that most 13 years olds should be able to handle.

After that, don't get me started on Service, because I don't like her for a clear misunderstanding of what service means. It doesn't involve quitting half way into a known term, because you have a shot to make more money and be on TV. She has proved all other listed reasons to be false, except for maybe the ethics violation one, that could be it too.

---

I see your point and it is a valid one. It is those bobbles and fumbles that don't make her presidential material.
But I still think she represents some things that the lefties despise.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

I see your point and it is a valid one. It is those bobbles and fumbles that don't make her presidential material.
But I still think she represents some things that the lefties despise.

---

I don't know that, for all her bluster, she has been for things like windfall profit taxes on oil companies.

I mean, she talks a good game, but when it gets right down to it I don't know how different she'd be.

She won't give it up...seriously. She is almost impressive now. And I guess it wasn't a blunder at all.