Printable View
I posted a pic on the Facebook and got a stupid, doltish reply from a libtard - (The "OMG really" ) so I had to school him...
Been having to do this a lot lately - might have to give up on the 'social interaction' of the interwebz...
But - there are SO MANY ignorant dolts that need schooled it just perturbs me.
(BTW: I know it's 'Facebook' - and therefor not real.)
Nice. Here is a good article too. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/...gun-ownership/
I doubt most of the members here (myself included) are old enough to remember the Kent State massacre. Hopefully they research it. I do imagine many of our members remember Ruby Ridge and Waco though. The circumstances of those incidents were a bit different than Kent State but they are still good examples of how our government deals with those who refuse to obey it's rules.
Same guy - different thread...
Holy shit. If that dork was cluttering up my Facebook page with his uneducated garbage I'd delete him in a heartbeat.
What a complete lack of intelligence.Quote:
Originally Posted by funkfool
Facebook is for women.
I broke down and reactivated my Facebook account but have been lucky to not see anything completely retarded in my feed.
My response to the above post:
Quote:
RE: Full automatic weapons used in crimes by their lawful owners:
You state: "...I would have to research it to verify" and "... that is beside the point"
No, I respectfully disagree, it is not. Lawful owners of these weapons, historically, do not commit crimes with them. Lawful owners of other types of firearms, in large part, do not commit crimes with their firearms either.
Most firearms used in crimes are not used by their lawful owners. Please take the time to verify that... I'll wait.
In the mean time, to address your other point: "Can you please tell me why any hunter needs more than 10 rounds in a clip?"
With all due respect, this debate on gun control is NOT about hunting. What it IS about is crime and tyranny and citizens ability to defend themselves against both.
I just find it hilarious that the people who say it's a fantasy for an armed citizen to confront a mass shooter are the same ones lining up to tackle the guy during his reload (because he only has ten rounds).
Pro tip: if you're within three yards of the guy, tackle him now. Don't wait for the reload. If you're outside of three yards, if you wait for the reload you'll get just close enough for a point-blank shot to the face.
I've been posting "positive" gun stories on my Facebook lately - stories that show guns in a good light, but don't make the MSM. Had a liberal co-worker (I've blocked his idiotic posts, but didn't unfriend him) comment on one about an armed school guard in Tennessee and how no one knows about her heroism. His comment? "Well no one remembers Neil Gardiner either".
Well, I hadn't heard of him so I did a quick search and realized, my co-worker must have picked it up from DailyKos because there was article there about Columbine in response to the NRA proposal. I also read a Denver Post article from last year about how Deputy Gardiner hadn't been wearing his prescription glasses that day, only uncorrected sunglasses. So I replied back to him to point that out as well as the fact that police tactics have changed significantly since then.
Any guesses on what the response was?
Dead silence. Which reminded me of the reason I blocked him in the first place. Even though this is a highly educated person, who has much respect in his profession, when it comes to political topics and liberal talking points he is not interested in facts and engages in the same liberal debating "tactics" they use on MSNBC - ignore, discount, and insult. That type is simply not interested in facts, logic, or reason in these areas of thought.
Damn whippersnappers !!! [ROFL1]Quote:
Originally Posted by ray1970
Wow. You caused a snot bubble to come out of my nose with that one!Quote:
Originally Posted by DavieD55
I just don't do Web 2.0 stuff. It will be abused and misused and I grow weary of the narcissists that think everyone gives a damn about what they're doing. Just live your lives.
^^^This.Quote:
Originally Posted by ray1970
Solution.
Did that a couple years ago and my life has been significantly better ever since.
Uh.. Claymores and RPGs are both legal to own.
Quote:
Originally Posted by asmotao
As dd's right?
Have you posted something like this yet?
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Germany established gun control in 1938. From 1939 to 1945, 13 million jewish people and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million "educated" people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
There are also other accounts that I don't feel like posting... The point is, in the last 100 years + or - a few, over 56 million people have been round up and killed after a government established gun control. Do you think that is a coincidence? There is a reason that the founding fathers put the second amendment in our constitution, and it wasn't so we could hunt, it was for self defense. So, while most liberals say that there is no need for a people to fear its government, 56 million dead people would beg to differ.