https://www.facebook.com/JohnHickenlooper
Evidently someone actually is reading his Facebook page.
Printable View
https://www.facebook.com/JohnHickenlooper
Evidently someone actually is reading his Facebook page.
I have spent some time there!
But it says he WILL sign the BGC's, mag capacity, and the other BS shit. What a douchebag!
I don't do facebook, can someone ask him how many rounds the illegal working at his restaurant used to murder Detective Young in 2005?
***
Thanks. I went ahead and posted quite the rant.
The pro comments make me sick! How can anyone support disenfranchising other citizens?
On the east coast.. Must sleep. Someone else needs to run with my take over of Hickenlooper's page (specifically responding to the comments on supporting gun control post). Should be fairly easy to spot my responses.
Fuck him. There obviously is no discussion if he is saying he will sign them
Who cares about him -- I am sniping on the people commenting. Much more fun.
I'm digging your posts. You have a lot more patience than I.Quote:
Originally Posted by asmotao
I thought you went to bed, so I was trying to stand up for you. Looks like I can go back to spectating.
MUST GO TO SLEEP..
But trying to figure out what this idiot David Lynch is trying to prove? Makes no sense -- his FB page is pro-gun, but he is posing anti-gun comments.
I shouldn't care.. why do I care..
Arguing on the Internet is like competing in the special olympics.. even if you win, you're still retarded.
Holy freaking god someone actually said, "Thank you. This is an excellent start ...and what about automatic assault weapons?"
These are the people who vote, folks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by asmotao
Dude, your posts have been awesome.
I love the response right under that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Teufelhund
"Automatic assault weapons...God help us....
People please educate yourselves!!!!"
So after sleeping on this I am thinking that this release was a preemptive strike -- responding to inside knowledge that the Senate will not support these bills. This way Hick gets to play both sides.
I wish I was that optimistic in my sleep.
I hope you're right.Quote:
Originally Posted by asmotao
I read a few posts and I think I threw up in my mouth a little bit.
I apologize for my less than civil response.
Quote:
Originally Posted by asmotao
I could only hope.
After discussing with my wife, we decided that we could endure these horrible laws for the 2 years to the next election.
Until the Senate bill was introduced...I can not abide that one.
I posted the following response:
Quote:
How can you say that our unanimous voices are being heard, and then throw it in our faces by saying that you're going to sign HB 1224, 1228, and 1229? If you had ACTUALLY read any of the comments posted here, you would understand that your political goals are NOT in line with what the people of Colorado want. I hope you realize your foolishness when Magpul gives you the middle finger and leaves Colorado and gives their revenue to a state that is much more deserving. Since you claim that you ARE actually reading our comments, I demand a well-reasoned response to why you plan to sign HB 1224, 1228, and 1229.
Wishful thinking but wrong. The Ink is already dry when they hit his desk. If anyone actually believes (again) hick will loose an opportunity to boost his standing with the O admin and D's in general. You are smoking crack.Quote:
Originally Posted by asmotao
IF the senate rejects any or the bills i will buy you lunch.
That's two of us. And we can throw down some beers to celebrate.Quote:
Originally Posted by jim
My most recent post to his page:
Mr. Hickenlooper,
In the midst of yet ANOTHER hit and run accident in Colorado, I have a few questions for you. I did some digging and it looks like about this time last year, Colorado Politicians were trying to find a solution to fix this under HB 1084. Under this bill, representatives (including Rhonda Fields) understood that a good way to stop these would be to increase the penalties for it. It made so much sense to everyone that there wasn't a single opponent. Brilliant!
So why, when trying to stop gun violence, do we start at making things more difficult for law abiding citizens instead of stiffening penalties for crimes involved firearms? In regards to hit and runs, politicians didn't look at making it harder to purchase a car. They didn't propose background checks before purchasing a car to ensure that criminals/undocumented/habitual offenders aren't getting behind the wheel. Why didnt they look at that? Why aren't we proposing bills to require proof of insurance for EVERY car purchase, not just ones from dealers? Don't we call that a loophole? The logic you and other representatives are trying to apply to gun violence is completely backwards from the very logic you used one year ago! That is why there is so much opposition to it. Please rethink your methods on this. Educated voters are paying attention.
Here is the link to HB 1084 article I referenced.
http://www.denverpost.com/murphy/ci_19984123
Thank you,
David Lowry
Castle Rock, CO.
Funny. Several of my posts from last night have been deleted.
People love the truth only when it suits them. Free speech and all.
Hm. None of your posts (I'm assuming you're the guy on FB with the assault gnome pic) that I read were uncivil or contained personal attacks. No reason for them to be taken down.Quote:
Originally Posted by asmotao
I guess noone should really be surprised, though.
Mine was civil, however I did say he was all about himself and his advancement in politics. Guess it got to them so WHhhooosh it was gone.
And then maybe the part about "My grandpaw always said never trust a man the grins all the time, he's up to something no good".