http://www.denverpost.com/breakingne...-before-senate
So what does this mean... are they not even going to vote on it? This is the first I've heard of it. Can anyone else confirm?
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingne...-before-senate
So what does this mean... are they not even going to vote on it? This is the first I've heard of it. Can anyone else confirm?
It will be the sacrificial lamb to make us think they are listening to us and care. The others will pass with a roaring applause from the libtards.
.
And this is how liberty dies, with a thunderous applause.Quote:
Originally Posted by mtnrider
It says he is killing it because of those stupid comments made by that dumb democrat.
That's very interesting. I don't think its the sacrificial bill to appease us. I think the strict liability bill is the sacrificial one. They are not killing it to avoid its passage (watch, it will pop back up later), I think they are killing it to get the MSM off the story of Salazar and Hudak's moronic comments.
I didnt think they could lawfully restrict carry on a tax funded campus as proven a few years ago. I think it was a BS bill from the start.
My guess is they are doing this because they have no chance of passage so they are killing it to keep people from making a formal vote.
That's very interesting. I don't think its the sacrificial bill to appease us. I think the strict liability bill is the sacrificial one. They are not killing it to avoid its passage or defeat (watch, it will pop back up later), I think they are killing it to get the MSM off the story of Salazar and Hudak's moronic comments.
now if they could only find the common sense to do the same with the rest of them
Good luck with that .....Quote:
Originally Posted by kraven251
well played sir, well played.Quote:
Originally Posted by mtnrider
I wouldn't be surprised if they try again with a bill that allows universities to set their own policy. This one was universal ban, they may try again with one not so restrictive.Quote:
Originally Posted by spqrzilla
Can we stop quoting Star Wars already? It's getting old.Quote:
Originally Posted by Madeinhb
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by DeusExMachina
This is not the quote you're looking for....[ROFL1]Quote:
Originally Posted by DeusExMachina
They gave up on it because the Republicans managed to get enough votes against it. It has nothing to do with helping the other bills through. They were going to lose in a vote today anyway.
One down....
Thank you for bringing in the truth into the thread finally. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Jer
And if we are going to quote it can we please keep the quotes to the good ones? I am doing my best to forget that Episodes 1-3 were even made.Quote:
Originally Posted by yjsaindon
Seems they are 'confident' that they have enough votes for the others to sail through. Or, i'm guessing, they would have gotten the same treatment. Of course, party senators talk to eachother. I think we're hoping for a "surprise" no-vote today or Monday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jer
Hear, hear.Quote:
Originally Posted by tmleadr03
I tend to over use this one... “This is Red 5, I’m going in.”Quote:
Originally Posted by tmleadr03
This what you tell your wife?Quote:
Originally Posted by ChunkyMonkey
Now more waffling. Says he is unsure now.
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingne...-before-senate
Damn
It's tough work but someone's gotta do it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChunkyMonkey
A party line is like a conga line, you are still expected to follow it, but you don't have any fun.
I am growing continuously tired of these weak willed ninnies and their inability to support their constituents or have any sort of free will.
That makes it sound like this bill was the sacrificial lamb intended to ensure the survival of the rest of the BS bills.Quote:
Originally Posted by J