Printable View
[Bang][Bang][Bang][facepalm][facepalm][facepalm][facepalm][facepalm][facepalm]
California Seizes Guns as Owners Lose Right to Bear Arms
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-12/california-seizes-guns-as-owners-lose-right-to-bear-arms.html?cmpid=yhoo
“We’re not contacting anybody who can legally own a gun,”
Is this a surprise to anyone?
They are organized, they are mobilized, they are not divided in their candidate choices and they will not stop until they accomplish their goal of total disarmament.
I we don't wake up and wise up, they WILL accomplish their goals.
And if we are not vigilant, this will be our headlines in Coloradofornia soon.
Registration never leads to confiscation.
Coming to Colorado soon.
Mike
A few things that stood out to me...
Other states may lack confiscation programs - So they admit that there are confiscation programs
Merely being in a database of registered gun owners and having a “disqualifying event,” such as a felony conviction or restraining order, isn’t sufficient evidence for a search warrant, Marsh said March 5 during raids in San Bernardino County. So the agents often must talk their way into a residence to look for weapons, he said. - Good to know that their not kicking in doors just yet.
It gags me that Germany went for a unified registry and there was barely a discernible whimper. Talk about folks who should've seen history as cyclic if unimpeded!
I find myself getting more calm and stoic in previsualizing encounters with "agents" of the regime.
Engaging in colloquial conversation to be civil and polite is a trap.
"Hi you don't know me but I want to come into your house and look around."Quote:
Originally Posted by kidicarus13
Still confused why anyone would let someone into their house. I don't even let the damn UPS guy past the front porch and he is pretty friendly and helpful.
Will always be used as a "tactic". Sometimes it's easier to catch a _____ with honey rather than vinegar.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trisha
Coming to a home near you... They will deem you unfit to own a firearm at their discretion once they get your medical records per barrycare.
Again Universal Background Check will always lead to Registration...and Registration will lead to?
Being stripped of all your assets so they can be redistributed. After that its cattle cars.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChunkyMonkey
Everything Hitler did was legal... In our now complacent society, everyone who has seen what real tyranny looks like is either really old and not telling stories any more, or dead.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trisha
People, by and large, are pretty dumb. I don't even let the girl scouts in my house... Cookies sold at the door, they wait at the door.Quote:
Originally Posted by kraven251
Just what I was thinking... Registration and then confiscation.Quote:
Originally Posted by MAP
so I go get a restraining order, claim you "Scared me" and now you lose your rights?
Due process is dead...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byte Stryke
I guess the swat teams will now serve restraining orders.
Let's see here, Gun Registration?
There was a person elected in 1932. His country of birth was a mystery. He would Parade Children all around him on a stage. everyone Loved him.
First, Gun Registration, We will Safe the Children
Next, Those who do nor register will be fined!
Next, The Jews who do not register will go to a Concentration Camp. Germans in Prison.
Next Gun Confiscation,
those who do not comply will be Shot. WE WILL HAVE A SAFER GERMANY & A SAFER WORLD, ADOLF HITLER--1937.
It took a few years but it did happen.
Yea, your right. Gun Registration, It will never happen to us?
Oh I forgot to mention, The Seven Year Process is Happening right now in front of your eye.
Thanks for Cheering me up.
Quote:
Almost 20,000 gun owners in the state are prohibited from possessing firearms, including convicted felons, those under a domestic violence restraining order or deemed mentally unstable.
I'm failing to see a problem here.Quote:
The no-gun list is compiled by cross-referencing files on almost 1 million handgun and assault-weapon owners with databases of new criminal records and involuntary mental-health commitments.
The start. I have no issue enforcing laws for people who shouldn't be in possession of a gun. The issue is from a health standpoint. Unfit to function in society great. HOWEVER at what point does the health system go from what's "right' to what the .gov ask? In NY the SAFE law states, A person judged to be a threat by a physician and or LE will have their firearms confiscated.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridge
We had a pediatrician many years ago the kid was using. I needed to take her for dr visit. In her waiting room was so much anti-gun propaganda it was the last visit there. The "all encompassing" health care provider who (what's the percentage?) does not support the 2nd and or a rabid AG can hold your freedoms in their hands. One signature has your rights removed w/out a trial, that's the issue i have.
Already happening.Quote:
Originally Posted by DavieD55
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...s-confiscated/
Actually that's pretty smart. No reason to let young girls into your home. Way to many bad things could come of that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin13
There's more to that story one might believe. Chocolate Mint is not a stripper at shot gun willies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooskibar03