http://www.denverpost.com/index.html...uestid=2610247
Go and vote.
Deny them yet another data point that would let them claim that we're in the minority.
Printable View
http://www.denverpost.com/index.html...uestid=2610247
Go and vote.
Deny them yet another data point that would let them claim that we're in the minority.
Kudos for a descriptive title, but....
http://www.ar-15.co/threads/94337-Hit-this-Poll
Do tell........
6886 in support of initiative
1606 against the initiative
55 need their food chewed for them
How many times did you guys vote:
7049 Votes, or 80.67 %
Just once. [Beer]
Voted
For. I oppose the limit and would vote to overturn the bill. 8636 Votes, or 80.89 %
Against. I support the limit and would vote to uphold the bill. 1965 Votes, or 18.40 %
Unsure. I haven't decided yet. 74 Votes, or 0.693 %
Hit.
voted for opposing the ban i like the yugo mag and ammo in the picture lol
Voted!
Thanks for posting that.
For--9,726. 80.68%
Against--2,238. 18.56%
pretty impressive results from a liberal rag like dp
hope the idiots at the capital start to listen!!!
And it will fall on deaf liberal ears.
Bet they don't run the results in the Sunday print version.
Sent from my DROID Pro using Tapatalk 2
Hit.
Somebody just ran a script to boost the "Against" numbers. I saw nearly 700 hits (progressively... about 40-50 per minute) until they reached 3,000 hits and then it stopped! It took about 20-25 minutes and then the hits went back to just 2 or 3 a minute.
hhhmmmmmm
[let me redact that]
rehit from my work computer
hit from home this morning and again from work
Voted. Amazing to see 80% for recall and still see these laws being voted yes on be democrats.
The script is being run again RIGHT NOW. As soon as we reached 80% again!
Voted!
BROBAR, how are you able to see that happening?
I just keep refreshing the results page and you can see them shooting up at a pace of 2-3 votes per second. In less than 10 minutes we went from 80% down to now in the 77-78% range.
I'm watching it to see if they stop the script at around the next thousand mark (4,000). That is what they did when they ran it earlier... they stopped it at around the 3,000 mark.
I figured out a way to vote more than once... but I can't keep up with their script.
They aren't stopping at the nearest 1,000 this time... they seem to be going for broke!
it take my pc at work here about 15 seconds to refresh/reload. I thought that might be how you were doing it. It just feels to slow to observe that. But if you got enough patience. I don't :-)
I figured out the pace by checking it out every few minutes and then dividing by however many seconds it was since the last time I refreshed.
"IF" you are voting multiple times please use a VPN to change your IP address. Otherwise they will call this a rigged poll because one guy from one IP address voted 3K times,I can picture them saying that to discredit gun owners. Just don't give them the ammo to shoot back at us.
I have been monitoring it also and the against are about 3-1 to the fors continuously. I refreshed it 8 times and it was consistently more against than for, and the undecided moved 1 vote that entire time. Something is fishy here.
I saw this happen too. We were at 81%, and then i just saw it wind down, in a matter of minutes, down to 75%. It's still sinking *by the second*. 300 "against overturn" votes in 30 seconds. The script for them to do this would be very easy to do. I would like to think we could stay on top without resorting to dirty tricks, though.... (As I typed this last line, 'against overturn' gained 47 votes.)
One thing to understand here. If this kind of business is going on, then we can bet that thousands of emails went to Hick in the same way.
I will say the progressive readers are DPO come out in spurts. Want to make your eyes bleed read the comments on some of the articles. It will go for pages with common sense people in the am and then come afternoon the progressives come out the comments turn against, almost like clockwork.
If that's true, 100+ of them are coming out a minute. Take a look for yourself. This began in earnest about an hour ago; we were in the 80-81% range since late last night. Still sinking by the second.
Somebody is definitely cheatin' for the libs.
This could be one hipster kid in an IT department doing this. DP may be none the wiser. Course if we were to do it, it'd be reported that the "EVIL GUN LOBBY USES CYBER WARFARE TO SWAY somethingsomething."
Who really fucking cares if it's one person? We've got people on this board suggesting how you can vote multiple times.
And the opposition to the initiative is still massively outnumbered.