A friend just sent me this. Interesting from the WSJ.
I wish they would have entitled their catagories differently:
Enhances Freedom and Restricts Freedom
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...%3Dinteractive
Printable View
A friend just sent me this. Interesting from the WSJ.
I wish they would have entitled their catagories differently:
Enhances Freedom and Restricts Freedom
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...%3Dinteractive
I think it's interesting that this one is considered strengthening the laws?
A quick search turned up this on an older page.Quote:
Wyoming - Would allow a judge to carry a weapon in his courtroom and prohibit someone else from carrying a weapon in his or her courtroom.
Quote:
What places are off-limits when carrying a concealed weapon in Wyoming?
- Any facility used primarily for law enforcement operations or administration without the written consent of the chief administrator
- Any detention facility, prison or jail
- Any courtroom, except that nothing in this section shall preclude a judge from carrying a concealed weapon or determining who will carry a concealed weapon in the courtroom
What's really cool about that article is this:
Attachment 25261
I guess the Utah legislature doesn't go weak in the knees at the sight of a man with a rifle slung over his shoulder.
It's only a Ruger. It's not like he could hit anything he was aiming at...Quote:
Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter
I think this one was actually under the "strengthening gun control laws" section. Or as i would have phrased it: Restricts FreedomQuote:
Originally Posted by th3w01f
LMAO... nice. I love it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridge
Or how about Arkansas? I think the map maker was really confused. This is nothing new for a news organization.Quote:
Originally Posted by losttrail
That's usually a problem with the shooter, not the rifle ... [hahhah-no] [AR15]Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridge
I dunno... those mini-14's don't have much of a rep for accuracy. It's the main reason I've shied away from them in general.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter
So THAT's why nobody on the A-Team ever hit a goddamn thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingo
Nah, they just didn't hit anybody cuz they pitied the fool...
I was able to hit a 12" steel plate at 180 yds off-hand 5 out of 10 times using the stock iron sights on my Mini-14 last weekend on my first mag through it since purchasing it (factory setting, no dialing in of the sights). The sights are kinda funky but I don't think it has an accuracy problem. I wouldn't want to bet my life on having to repeatedly hit 200 yd targets with it but at 100 yds I wouldn't be so skeptical.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingo
Isn't that the standard excuse for poor shooting? Ranchers don't seem to have a problem hitting coyotes or prairie dogs with them and I doubt they'd be such a popular platform if they were as bad as you're making them out to be. I hate the legal crap imprinted on the barrels but I have yet to see a Ruger that had accuracy problems -- Ruger shooters yes, Ruger firearms not so much.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingo
^^^^^ThisQuote:
Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter