Close
Page 86 of 125 FirstFirst ... 3676818283848586878889909196 ... LastLast
Results 851 to 860 of 1243
  1. #851
    ChrisC
    Guest

    Default

    Yep and they would be considered prohibited persons and would not pass because they are under 18.

  2. #852
    Gong Shooter MAP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Windsor, CO
    Posts
    425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XC700116 View Post
    It needs to be done before it goes into effect, because the trust transfer is killed in an amendment to the bill.
    True.

  3. #853
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Milliken, CO
    Posts
    1,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by th3w01f View Post
    This looks like the trust portion. Does this mean that my 6 and 9 year olds will have to do background check when transferring firearms into the trust since they're the beneficiaries?

    (b) AS USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT REQUIRES
    17 OTHERWISE, "TRANSFEREE" MEANS A PERSON WHO DESIRES TO RECEIVE OR
    18 ACQUIRE A FIREARM FROM A TRANSFEROR. IF A TRANSFEREE IS NOT A
    19 NATURAL PERSON BUT A CORPORATION, ASSOCIATION, PARTNERSHIP, OR
    20 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OR TRUST, THE REQUIREMENT DESCRIBED IN
    21 THIS SUBSECTION (1) SHALL BE INTERPRETED TO REQUIRE A BACKGROUND
    22 CHECK OF EACH MEMBER, PARTNER, OFFICER, OR OTHER PERSON WHO
    23 HOLDS A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THE CORPORATION, ASSOCIATION,
    24 PARTNERSHIP, OR LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OR TRUST.

    Most likely since they are not old enough to own firearms, you can't even buy them with the trust until they are old enough, because yes, the way the text of the bill is written, they'd need a BGC and Fed/CBI will deny them due to age.

  4. #854
    Just a little different buckshotbarlow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    littleton
    Posts
    1,866

    Default

    here we go...1228
    NRA BP+PPITH Instructor
    CO state senator: 2nd Amendment doesn't protect duck hunting, therefore:
    2 non web feet bad,
    2 web feet good...
    Vas-tly Different Now...and prefers corn to peas

  5. #855
    Mr Yamaha brutal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Unincorporated Douglas County, CO
    Posts
    13,959

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MAP View Post
    A solution may be to put all of your firearms in a Trust so that you and your husband have equal access.

    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by jslo View Post
    Have not seen the text for myself but someone here on the floor said something to the effect it would not have to be transferred if it did not leave the home.
    I still don't understand how this affects us if I am out of town for a week or more. I thought they specifically excluded trust "transfers." Someone help me understand how if my wife is already a trustee she cannot possess the guns? How adding my best friend of 22 years to my trust temporarily is not allowed? How would this affect beneficiary receipt of the guns if both my wife and I die?

    (FWIW, I was distracted while writing and missed the last 20 posts before posting)
    Last edited by brutal; 03-11-2013 at 13:46.
    My Feedback
    Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
    Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
    Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."

  6. #856
    WONT PAY DEBTS
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    1,639

    Default

    not up on my screen, still says they are at lunch

  7. #857
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Milliken, CO
    Posts
    1,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lowbeyond View Post
    Nope. There is no grandfathering language. What it says is that even though items are in a trust you still need a BCG to transfer them between members of the trust.

    SHALL BE INTERPRETED TO REQUIRE A BACKGROUND
    22 CHECK OF EACH MEMBER, PARTNER, OFFICER, OR OTHER PERSON WHO
    23 HOLDS A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN THE CORPORATION, ASSOCIATION,
    24 PARTNERSHIP, OR LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OR TRUST.

    Now of course that is what the law says. It is up to you if you want to comply.

    Put the lines 17-21 in front of that, it's on acquisition/transfer, not previously held. IE Trust/Trustees already own it, same as private party. For instance, you nor I have to go out and get BGC's for every gun we already own. So as long as it's already owned by the trust/trustees, it's not applicable. BUT every new addition is.
    Last edited by XC700116; 03-11-2013 at 13:43.

  8. #858
    Machine Gunner th3w01f's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Castle Rock, CO
    Posts
    1,626

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XC700116 View Post
    Most likely since they are not old enough to own firearms, you can't even buy them with the trust until they are old enough, because yes, the way the text of the bill is written, they'd need a BGC and Fed/CBI will deny them due to age.
    OK, that really makes things a mess since I'm waiting on 2 NFA items that will not be here before 7/1.

  9. #859
    WONT PAY DEBTS
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    1,639

    Default

    link! I need a link!

  10. #860
    Gong Shooter colo-pr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    402

    Default

    well, they aprove the 1229 right?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •