Yep and they would be considered prohibited persons and would not pass because they are under 18.
Yep and they would be considered prohibited persons and would not pass because they are under 18.
here we go...1228
NRA BP+PPITH Instructor
CO state senator: 2nd Amendment doesn't protect duck hunting, therefore:
2 non web feet bad,
2 web feet good...
Vas-tly Different Now...and prefers corn to peas
I still don't understand how this affects us if I am out of town for a week or more. I thought they specifically excluded trust "transfers." Someone help me understand how if my wife is already a trustee she cannot possess the guns? How adding my best friend of 22 years to my trust temporarily is not allowed? How would this affect beneficiary receipt of the guns if both my wife and I die?
(FWIW, I was distracted while writing and missed the last 20 posts before posting)
Last edited by brutal; 03-11-2013 at 13:46.
My Feedback
Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."
not up on my screen, still says they are at lunch
Put the lines 17-21 in front of that, it's on acquisition/transfer, not previously held. IE Trust/Trustees already own it, same as private party. For instance, you nor I have to go out and get BGC's for every gun we already own. So as long as it's already owned by the trust/trustees, it's not applicable. BUT every new addition is.
Last edited by XC700116; 03-11-2013 at 13:43.
link! I need a link!
well, they aprove the 1229 right?