Serious questions about the libtard mag limit law

[Zundfolge]

For the umpteenth time:

“Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with.”
-Scene from Atlas Shrugged

[Ronin13]

So just don't follow the law. That's a great idea. What other laws should we ignore?

Well did you know it's still illegal (punishment is still hanging) for cutting a barbed wire fence that you don't own? Or about in Boulder, there's a law that states your llamas cannot graze on city property. There are plenty of laws that are either asinine, unconstitutional, or just plain retarded... most of which are near-impossible (magazine ban) to enforce. The only way to truly have a magazine ban that is enforceable is to not have a grandfather clause. I seriously doubt there will be many, if any, arrests related to this bullshit law.

[kidicarus13]

Well did you know it's still illegal (punishment is still hanging) for cutting a barbed wire fence that you don't own? Or about in Boulder, there's a law that states your llamas cannot graze on city property. There are plenty of laws that are either asinine, unconstitutional, or just plain retarded... most of which are near-impossible (magazine ban) to enforce. The only way to truly have a magazine ban that is enforceable is to not have a grandfather clause. I seriously doubt there will be many, if any, arrests related to this bullshit law.

I think for the first time ever I agree with Ronin on this one.

[Squeeze]

Well did you know it's still illegal (punishment is still hanging) for cutting a barbed wire fence that you don't own? Or about in Boulder, there's a law that states your llamas cannot graze on city property. There are plenty of laws that are either asinine, unconstitutional, or just plain retarded... most of which are near-impossible (magazine ban) to enforce. The only way to truly have a magazine ban that is enforceable is to not have a grandfather clause. I seriously doubt there will be many, if any, arrests related to this bullshit law.

+1 for Ronin. Rock on brother. I've said it before...these moron politicians who are supportive of these gun control bills can kiss my ass.

[centrarchidae]

Well did you know it's still illegal (punishment is still hanging) for cutting a barbed wire fence that you don't own?

Please tell me you have a source for that.

[buckshotbarlow]

i'm going to create a trust, put all my crap in there, kids wife, nephews mom and dad...hopefully that should cover it, along with my 3 stamps...

[sniper7]

I have a hard time believing this will become an issue unless you all of a sudden start getting the mag police to check all over the place and then they have to have burden or proof. it isn't like the mags are registered like a car. hell, they don't even check a trailer registration (at least mine never has been).

[Squeeze]

You know, something I was just pondering. As most of us have acknowledged, HB 1224 is going to be next to impossible to enforce. Now, that being said here's where I think we could see it come into play. Say a CCW holder gets mixed up in a shooting (legitimate or otherwise). The DA sees he is using a magazine over 15 rounds in his carry piece. They could easily ammend the charge and have to prove he purchased the magazines prior to 7/1/2013. It's just one more piece of legislation to use against us in the event they hook us for something else (I call it a "stacker" charge). Other than the odd possibility of local LE checking magazines at the range, I don't see this legislation being very enforceable at all. My

[newracer]

I am not worried about this law for me, I have more magazines that I can use in my lifetime. I worry for my kids and there kids. I want our future generations to be free.

[rockhound]

the owner of the magazine has to be in possession of the magazine at all times.

you cannot take you kids to the range and let them fire your weapon, once this passes, you and the other party will both be guilty
you cannot take your buddy, new to the sport, to the range and let him try your ar with a 30 round magazine in, once this passes
if your wife grabs your gun and shoots an intruder with it while your magazine is in the gun that would be illegal, once this passes.
you cannot leave them to your heirs
my kids are not old enough to give them to them now, so i am the only one who will be able to legally use them in my household

i am going to get a few "legal mags" to use on a daily gun range basis, and put some of those nasty hi cap magazines away for when the zombies show up

hopefully we can vote the fu..... out of office get back to a normal day in this state at which time i can use my standard mags again

just a thought, magpul will be making a colorado legal magazine at some point i assume, anyone seen an eta?