Close

View Poll Results: Should College Students with a Permit be Allowed to Carry on Campus?

Voters
48. You may not vote on this poll
  • No under any circumstance

    4 8.33%
  • Yes, after demonstrating firearm competence

    4 8.33%
  • Yes, after divulging the students schedule to the university's police or administration

    0 0%
  • Yes, after rendering the students schedule, and demonstrating firearm competence

    1 2.08%
  • Yes, if they have a permit, let them carry!

    39 81.25%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Machine Gunner BadShot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    1,614

    Default

    Change schools if it actually means anything to you

  2. #2
    Sits like a bitch
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Unincorporated Douglas County
    Posts
    3,527

    Default Has there always been a "Legislation & Politics" thread???

    Has there always been a "Legislation & Politics" thread???
    Its awesome!!!
    Can we get a "Religious Antagonism" thread please.

    I am a no because I think young kids in groups are too dumb. A lone young adult may be intelligent, but kids in groups are totally idiotic.

    I don't think it should be a federal case though. Maybe a school-by-school policy is better.
    If your post count is higher than your round count, you are a troll.

  3. #3
    Rampart Runner
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Delfuego View Post
    I am a no because I think young kids in groups are too dumb.

    "Kids" are not licensed to carry firearms in any state in the union.

  4. #4
    Iceman sniper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    16,987

    Default

    If they are 21 and over, can get the license, then I see no reason as to why not.
    the school doesn't need to know...they may be targeted not only by any person that comes in armed and ready to kill but by any anti-professors who would like to see them fail at life for their god given right to own a firearm and using it to defend themselves and others.

    I see issues with students on campus having firearms but since they are over 21, pass all the background info, then I don't see enough cons against it to deny them their right to defend themselves.
    All I have in this world is my balls and my word and I don't break em for no one.

    My Feedback

  5. #5
    Grand Master Know It All Batteriesnare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Monument Area
    Posts
    3,764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sniper7 View Post
    I see issues with students on campus having firearms but since they are over 21, pass all the background info, then I don't see enough cons against it to deny them their right to defend themselves.
    I agree with this. While I do live off of campus property, I am close to the University. The funny part is that the University will allow you to have alcohol in your dorm or on campus as long as your are 21, and everyone else in the doom room is 21, heck they even serve it at football games (which is the only reason to go with the current team ) or at University sponsored activities. So if alcohol is okay, and all you have to do is flash a card saying you are 21, which you may or may not be, why not allow a card that represents deep background checks, expenses and firearm competency?

  6. #6
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Metro
    Posts
    136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sniper7 View Post
    If they are 21 and over, can get the license, then I see no reason as to why not.
    the school doesn't need to know...they may be targeted not only by any person that comes in armed and ready to kill but by any anti-professors who would like to see them fail at life for their god given right to own a firearm and using it to defend themselves and others.

    I see issues with students on campus having firearms but since they are over 21, pass all the background info, then I don't see enough cons against it to deny them their right to defend themselves.
    I can't believe on this forum that this is even an issue (not directed at you sniper7, just beginning a general all-purpose rant). Our armed forces are filled with people under 21 (I think you can even get in at 17 with parental consent) who are given fully automatic M-16s to kill people with. Yet some would suggest that because they are young adults they shouldn't have the same rights as older adults? I still can't understand why an Iraq veteran can come back after having fought there and can't legally have a beer, because our nanny state says 'he is not old enough to handle it'.

    The poll doesn't even list my answer: college students over 18 (as well as the rest of us) should be able to carry WITHOUT a permit. I agree with Vermont and Alaska who allow concealed carry without need for a government permit--I have never heard of problems in those states arising from that. The second amendment states that "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". How is a permit requirement not an infringement of that 2nd Amendment right? If you had to get a permit before you could write a controversial editorial exercising your 1st amendment right to free speech, would anyone find that acceptable?

  7. #7

    Default

    THANK YOU EOW!!!!!

    What's the matter with you guys?!? The 2nd Amendment doesn't say "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, unless the government wants to."

    Since when is there a difference between a 20 year old "adult" and a 21 year old "adult". When people turn 21 do they just magically "grow up overnight" and suddenly become responsible and mature enough to handle a handgun? AND if you do a $#!*load of paperwork, you can carry one UNDER your clothes! Does anyone here honestly think that requiring a permit would have prevented the Virginia Tech shooting? The only thing these laws do is victimize the honest people that need them the most. If somebody was carrying on campus and saw Cho walking around shooting people, do you think it would have gone on? Would so many people have died?

    No number of gun laws is going to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. Handguns are illegal in Chicago... Do you think there is no handgun related crime in Chicago?
    Nope, there's no handgun crime in Chicago. And Santa Clause is real.

  8. #8
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    21,971
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Very good arguements gentlemen. I am in full agreement. Yes, allowing 18+, or even 21+ students to carry a firearm for self protection does possess some degree of risk. With that said, doesn't allowing a 16 year old to get a drivers license and operate a motor vehicle solo also possess a risk (in all honesty, the worst drivers I've seen the last few years have all been over 25)?

    Life is risk. If we stop allowing people to do things, especially those things which are guaranteed Constitutional rights, simply on the basis of potential risks, we might as well just find a place to sit down and die right now.

    Quote Originally Posted by MichiganMilitia View Post
    And Santa Clause is real.
    Um, just what do you mean by that? Certainly you arent implying that jolly old Saint Nick is merely a fable; are you?
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  9. #9
    Sits like a bitch
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Unincorporated Douglas County
    Posts
    3,527

    Default

    You guys latch on to the dumbest things. The point was that even intelligent young adults act like dumb "kids" when they are in groups. How hard is that to understand. But you guys are always right and I am always wrong. So just answer the fucking poll question and get on with your life. If you want to disagree with me then I am happy enough.

    PS: Did nobody actually read where it said school-by-school policy?
    If your post count is higher than your round count, you are a troll.

  10. #10
    Rampart Runner
    Guest

    Default

    I am a no because I think young kids in groups are too dumb. A lone young adult may be intelligent, but kids in groups are totally idiotic.
    Yeah!...like all those dumb kids in the military..oh wait.

    But you guys are always right and I am always wrong.
    Well at least we agree on something.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •