Close
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Plainsman
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    colorado springs
    Posts
    3,438

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Circuits View Post

    Though I admit to some curiosity about both your pricing (CHF costing 2x plain-jane), and as to whether you've ever shot out even one barrel, much less multiples to be worrying about an unspecified cost differential for replacement. I have paid about $100 more for a BCM chf complete upper than the same upper with a non chf, chrome lined barrel, out of a total cost of about $500. Maybe the bare barrels would have been more like $200 for non chf to $300 for chf, but that'd still be only 50% more cost for 2x barrel life. And most folks buy uppers, not barrels, so it will seem even more diluted to them.
    I agree plus if your comparing high end stainless barrels vs high end chf barrels there is no cost difference

    Do you want a dead nuts accurate 1/4moa stainless lothar walther barrel with a >10000 round service life(probably way less if your shooting benchrest)

    Or a 1 moa chf barrel that's going to last <20000+

    The neat thing about our hobby is that there both good choices for different people

  2. #2
    High Power Shooter Rabid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    967

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Circuits View Post
    You tend to get far more perfect, and consistent bores from CHF than you ever would from boring a blank, rifling it, chambering it and lapping it. If the mandrel is good, all the barrels that come off it are going to be damn near identical.
    I was responding to that statement, if they are so much more perfect why are they not used for match? FYI You still have to bore a blank, rifle it, chamber it and contour it for any style of rifling. Yes i am talking about a bare barrel.

    Quote Originally Posted by cofi View Post
    I agree plus if your comparing high end stainless barrels vs high end chf barrels there is no cost difference

    Do you want a dead nuts accurate 1/4moa stainless lothar walther barrel with a >10000 round service life(probably way less if your shooting benchrest)

    Or a 1 moa chf barrel that's going to last <20000+

    The neat thing about our hobby is that there both good choices for different people
    Do you both really think you get twice the life out of a CHF barrel? That would be a gigantic selling point but you dont hear those claims because its not true. At 10k+ round count your throat is going to be pretty eroded and your not going to get 1 moa.

  3. #3
    Joe_K
    Guest

    Default

    I have not heard of a non chrome lined CHF barrel. Correct me if Im wrong but arent most if not all national match rifles non chrome lined? Also Read the review of the filthy 14 bcm middy that shot 14 k. CHF is great for guys who only require 3 moa or under. Cut rifling probably does better for match grade competition types who want gnats ass moa but dont care if they olny get 1-3 k out of one barrel. Cut rifling can be made very smooth with lapping honing and other post rifling techniques but fir a large volume barrel that will last 1.5 x plus and will not be expected to be used as a target rifle at camp perry imho you cant do wrong going the CHF route.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •