So, FedEx, how's your gun free zone working out for you?

[Jamnanc]

It's not crass, it's an honest assessment of what these policies reap. I'm angry. This experiment with gun free zones is long over, the data is in and the conclusion is that it's causing people to die.

Stop assuming the lawful will be lawless (the "Office arguments will break out into shootouts!" argument) and the lawless to be lawful (expecting a murderer to obey a sign) and start SAVING lives by allowing people to carry.

O2

Well stated, still a tasteless thread title, put yourself in the shoes of a fence sitter on the second amendment. You'd think the gun owners are callous assholes. The title could easily be changed to still get the point across and not be so cold hearted. FedEx policy is stupid, but someone has injured/possibly dead loved ones to consider.

Great at video by the way.

[BlasterBob]

It's not crass, it's an honest assessment of what these policies reap. I'm angry. This experiment with gun free zones is long over, the data is in and the conclusion is that it's causing people to die.

Stop assuming the lawful will be lawless (the "Office arguments will break out into shootouts!" argument) and the lawless to be lawful (expecting a murderer to obey a sign) and start SAVING lives by allowing people to carry.

O2

+1. Well said.

[Ronin13]

It's not crass, it's an honest assessment of what these policies reap. I'm angry. This experiment with gun free zones is long over, the data is in and the conclusion is that it's causing people to die.

Stop assuming the lawful will be lawless (the "Office arguments will break out into shootouts!" argument) and the lawless to be lawful (expecting a murderer to obey a sign) and start SAVING lives by allowing people to carry.

O2

Well put! All but two major shootings in the last 30 years have been in "Gun Free Zones." I think that's telling enough, gun free zones are only that to those who would respect the rule of law and the policies enacted by the property owner to prohibit a means of defense at their location... bad guys on the other hand... As if the left believes the gunman will just put down his gun and walk away if told "Hey! You can't have that here, this is a gun free zone!"

[ZERO THEORY]

Unfortunately, this will just further build support for gun free zones, OP. If you're expecting antis and bleeding heart liberals to recant their positions over hard data, anecdotal accounts, or empirical evidence you clearly don't understand just how far the delusion and denial of the liberal mindset goes.

[Madeinhb]

Libtards are all over this because it happened in the city where the law is everyone must own a gun in the house.

[rbeau30]

It's not crass, it's an honest assessment of what these policies reap. I'm angry. This experiment with gun free zones is long over, the data is in and the conclusion is that it's causing people to die.

Stop assuming the lawful will be lawless (the "Office arguments will break out into shootouts!" argument) and the lawless to be lawful (expecting a murderer to obey a sign) and start SAVING lives by allowing people to carry.

O2

+ 1 I believe that the presence of a "gun free zone" puts lives in danger, so why not be angry?

[Irving]

Has anyone ever considered that gun free zones are generally places with high capacity of people al in one place, so it may be merely a coincidence that people who intend to shoot a lot of people also go to those same places?

[rbeau30]

A lot of those folks also kill themselves at the first sign of resistance/cops with guns.

I do not know real statistics, but it sure seems the cowards want to do the most damage before they have to take themselves out.

[Delfuego]

So, FedEx, how's your gun free zone working out for you?

This statement sure sounds disrespectful to me. Every time something tragic like this happens we get a thread with people gloating.
Respect for the dead is a very simple an ancient concept.

[Colorado_Outback]

Must be that time of the month around here again..