I thought all the military people liked it. That's why I even checked it out in the first place.
I thought all the military people liked it. That's why I even checked it out in the first place.
"There are no finger prints under water."
So, having visa's in his passport which are required to travel, having flash cards and a book critical of US foreign policy are exactly the things I'd expect a student studying US foreign policy to have.
There's no way to become more knowledgeable about a subject than to address issues from both sides, including the negative side.
Should they have addressed why he had all that stuff? Sure.
Did they have to treat him like a terrorist and hold him for so long? Not necessarily.
Did they have to apologize after letting him go? Not required, but if I were doing the interrogating only to find out it's some poor college student scared out of his whits, I'd definitely apologize at the end.
edit: And The Hurt Locker is in the mail to me right now from Netflix, I get it today and am going to watch it tonight.
When you're there and pulling missions outside the wire a couple times a week, your "Oh Shit" file in your brain gets moved to the front of the filing cabinet. It takes a long time to refile that info back a little and relax. To this day, I sometimes see shit on the side of the road as I'm driving by and catch myself thinking about secondary identifiers, initiator markers, anyone by the road with a cell phone in their ear... Shit like that. It's not as bad as it was, but it's still there. It's how the high level of tension/stress at the time can rewire you so strong it's hard to get rid of. I really don't want a reminder of that level of tension.
Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.
Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.
Ahhh, I see. That makes sense. Then I agree that you might want to pass. Some pretty intense scenes in there. Well, intense for a doughy civilian like me.
"There are no finger prints under water."
pretty much common sense to not carry anything or say anything that involves terrorism or bomb etc on the plane. It is called common sense, and IMO the TSA has the right to question the guy, not necessarily arrest him though. he does need questioning and interrogation.
sometime you just never know with people. who would have thought a high class guy would try to blow up a northwest A330. and who would have guessed a psychologist in the army would kill service members at Ft. Hood.
I mean if the pilots of your plane came on the PA and were announcing there is nothing to worry about, they have only crashed once, you might want off the plane right?
I was thinking these exact things as I was reading through all of the posts on this thread. If this person had just had one of the red flag items I might say that they really over-reacted. Two red flag items is questionable. THREE red flag items is just asking for attention. Either this guy is just plain clueless or he was trying to get the atetention he ended up getting.
Ginsue - Admin
Proud Infidel Since 1965
"You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020
Ginsue's Feedback
So is he not supposed to fly then?
"There are no finger prints under water."
in all reality there probably wouldn't be anything wrong with him flying, but he drew way too much attention to himself.
it would be like driving next to a cop drinking a bottle of root beer in a brown paper bag waving at him and giving him a cheers! You might just get pulled over!
I blame the guy for being a dumbass and drawing the attention to himself, which is probably want he wanted so he could have the chance to sue or get free flights from the airline etc. etc. people like that are out there always looking for a handout, to get their name in the paper or start a lawsuit.
just think about how many people go to a restaurant, say the food was shitty hoping they would get the food for free. My buddy used to work at TGI fridays as a bartender and said it happened all the time.